How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bernoulli information density and exact typical-set counts
Example
Let be IID Bernoulli on , with natural logarithms and entropy where . For , let be its number of ones. If and , put . Then Its probability and size also satisfy the bounds of Typical-set probability and cardinality bounds with and for , and at or . At , every binary word is typical for every and . At or , the typical set is the single supported word and .
For example, at , , and , we have , so the typical words have zero, one, or two ones. Thus and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Bernoulli source and typical-set convention in the Example.
Self-information and surprisal variance for a finite law: The surprisal variance is .
Self-information and surprisal variance for a finite law: On positive support, self-information is .
Information density and typical sets for a finite source: is the positive-probability set where .
Finite-alphabet IID source: The Bernoulli coordinates are IID with product block law .
Finite distributions, entropy, divergence, and stochastic matrices: with zero terms set to zero, in natural units.
Typical-set probability and cardinality bounds: The typical-set tail probability is at most , and its cardinality is bounded above and below by the stated entropy exponents.
Verification
Given: , , and .
Suppose and a word has ones, with . Its block probability is , so . Subtracting gives .
If , each supported word has probability , so and all words are typical. If or , the support consists of one symbol, its surprisal and entropy are zero, and the only supported length- word is typical.
If additionally , the typicality condition in [F3] is exactly . There are words of weight , yielding the displayed sum with endpoints clipped to . For the stated check, the allowed weights are , so the count is and the probability is .
For , the one-letter surprisal takes two values whose difference is . Its variance is : writing the values as , their mean is , and the centered-square sum is . At or , the surprisal is zero on its singleton support, so [F1] gives . Substituting these variances and into [F6] gives the claimed quantitative probability and cardinality bounds.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, 2nd ed., Chapter 3, §§3.1–3.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- MIT OpenCourseWare 6.441 Information Theory, Spring 2010, Lecture 3: AEP and typical sets (standard reference, not scraped)