Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ccc posets are proper by maximal antichains

Statement

Let P be ccc, let M be a relevant countable elementary submodel containing P, and let pPM. Then p itself is an (M,P)-master condition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ZFC, the stronger-is-smaller forcing order, and P,M,p as in the Statement.

[F1]

Every ccc forcing preorder is proper; the verification below calculates the stronger master condition used in that proof. Ccc and countably closed forcings are proper

Verification

1.1

Fix a dense set DP with DM. By elementarity, inside M choose a maximal antichain AD. It is also maximal in P: maximality is the first-order assertion that every rP is compatible with some aA, and all witnesses to compatibility are conditions in the ambient Hθ. Since P is ccc, A is countable in the universe. Elementarity then puts in M a surjection e:ωA (or a finite enumeration), and every n<ω belongs to M; hence AM.

F1Given
2.1

Let rp be arbitrary. Maximality of A gives aA compatible with r. By step 1.1, aADM. Thus DM is predense below p. Since this holds for every dense DM, p is (M,P)-generic; the reflexive inequality pp makes it a master below the original p.

F1step 1.1
3.1

The calculation works unchanged when P, A, or D is finite. A dense subset of the stipulated nonempty P cannot be empty, and for a one-condition order its unique condition is the required antichain member and master. No stronger condition than p was constructed: ccc makes the starting condition itself sufficient.

F1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources