How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The and fundamental alcoves: coordinates, corner vectors, and facet types
Example
Let with its standard inner product. In type , take with , , and . In type , take with long, short, and long. The standard affine walls are , and the affine type facet uses .
For , the fundamental alcove is the interior of the triangle with vertices Its facet types on are , respectively, and the origin is its unique corner with . The affine Coxeter matrix has . Exactly three walls pass through , namely . The six boundary panels in the local cycle around alternate types , so an orientation and starting panel give the circuit word . The wall carries a type- panel on the ray from toward and a type- panel on its opposite ray.
For , the coroots are , , and . The fundamental alcove is the interior of the triangle with vertices , , and ; its facet types on are . Its affine Coxeter matrix has , , and . No axiom of choice is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two explicit root sets above, their standard inner products, the affine wall convention, and the fundamental affine facet-type labels.
A reduced crystallographic root system is a finite spanning root set invariant under its root reflections, with integral Cartan numbers and no root multiples other than its positive and negative (Reduced crystallographic Euclidean root system).
The coroot is (Coroot and dual root system).
The affine wall is and its reflection is (Affine root hyperplanes, coroot translations, alcoves, and the affine reflection group).
In each irreducible component, the region for all simple roots and is the fundamental alcove, a geometric simplex with facets on the simple-root level-zero walls and the highest-root level-one wall; the statement applies componentwise (Highest-root dominance and the fundamental alcove).
The facets of the fundamental alcove have their assigned types, and a shared panel has the same type on either side (Alcove separation, facet reflections, panel types, and triviality of the fundamental alcove stabilizer).
The fundamental facet reflections give the affine Coxeter presentation; its matrix entry is the order of the product of the corresponding reflections (Alcove transitivity, the affine Coxeter presentation, and the length function).
At a codimension-two face, the incident alcoves form a cycle of panels alternating between the two local types, and its boundary word is the corresponding rank-two Coxeter relator (Point stabilizers, vertex residues, and rank-two boundary words).
Verification
Given: The displayed coordinate sets, simple roots, highest roots, and the wall convention.
In , all six roots have squared norm and directions with angles that are multiples of . The set spans ; if a root has direction , its reflecting line is perpendicular to it and reflection sends a root direction to , so it permutes the six roots. For roots , the Cartan number is , an integer because the possible inner products are . The only roots on each root line are its two displayed signs, so the system is reduced. The positive roots for the chamber bounded by are ; the first two are simple, is the highest root, and each coroot is .
In , the roots span . Reflection with short-root normal changes the sign of coordinate , while reflection with long-root normal swaps coordinates and reflection with normal sends to ; these signed coordinate maps preserve the displayed set. If is short, and ; if is long, and . Thus all Cartan numbers are integral, and the explicit root lines show reducedness. The positive roots are , so are simple and is highest. The coroot formula gives , , and .
For , [F4] gives the region , , . Writing , the vertices are the pairwise intersections of its three boundary lines: the two simple-root walls meet at ; gives and , hence ; gives and , hence . By [F5], these three facets have types . Since and , the origin is the unique such corner.
For , [F4] gives , , and . Intersecting the boundary pairs gives from , from and , and from and . By [F5], the facets on have types .
The three facet-wall pairs meet at . Their normals have pairwise inner products of absolute value , so the corresponding lines meet at acute angle . Translating the intersection to the origin turns each affine reflection pair into a pair of linear line reflections; their product rotates by or and has order . Since the coroots are twice the roots, the coroot pairing products are and for . Thus [F6] gives .
At , the root pairings are and . Since the positive roots are exactly , these give precisely the three walls . Their normal lines have the three directions modulo separated by , so the local arrangement has six sectors; [F7] identifies them with the six incident alcoves. The fundamental alcove has types and at this vertex, and [F7] gives the alternating six-panel cycle. Its boundary word, in a suitable orientation and starting point, is ; [F6] identifies the Coxeter generators with the facet generators, and , so . The panel of the fundamental alcove along the ray from toward has type ; three positions later in the alternating cycle the opposite ray of the same wall has type . Thus the type belongs to a panel, not to the whole wall.
In , , , and . Together with the coroots from 1.2, the products of Cartan pairings for pairs are respectively , , and . The corresponding line angles are , respectively, so products of the intersecting affine reflections are rotations by or , with orders . By [F6], the affine matrix therefore has , , and . Both coordinate models and all their corner and endpoint calculations are finite and explicit, so no axiom of choice is used.
Remarks
Open Step-3 supplier obligations. The current-run draft supplier lem-cg-affine-point-stabilizers-and-vertex-residues is used in Fact F7 and proof step 4.1 for the six incident sectors, alternating local panel labels, and rank-two boundary word. Its item decision remains escalated because its proof uses the draft lem-cg-integer-pairings-and-allowed-dihedral-labels in step 2.4 and draft def-hh-coxeter-matrix-word-group-and-length in step 5.1. The current-run draft supplier thm-cg-affine-alcove-transitivity-presentation-and-length is used in Fact F6 and proof steps 3.1, 4.1, and 5.1 for the affine Coxeter matrix and presentation; its item decision remains escalated because its proof uses draft lem-cg-affine-generic-gallery-paths-and-disk-moves and draft def-hh-coxeter-matrix-word-group-and-length. These supplier uses remain provisional pending their completed Step-3 decisions, so this example's item decision remains escalated.
Depends on
- Affine root hyperplanes, coroot translations, alcoves, and the affine reflection group
- Affine reflections: translation form, involutivity, local finiteness, and $W_a=Q^\vee\rtimes W$
- Highest-root dominance and the fundamental alcove
- Alcove separation, facet reflections, panel types, and triviality of the fundamental alcove stabilizer
- Point stabilizers, vertex residues, and rank-two boundary words
- Alcove transitivity, the affine Coxeter presentation, and the length function
- Reduced crystallographic Euclidean root system
- Coroot and dual root system
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
73 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. Aguiar and T. K. Petersen, The module of affine descent classes of a Weyl group (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. B. Lewis, J. McCammond, T. K. Petersen, P. Schwer, Computing reflection length in an affine Coxeter group (standard reference, not scraped)