Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A rank-three chain labeling translated into facets of the order complex

Example

Label each cover S⋖S∪{i} of the Boolean lattice B3=B({1,2,3}) (The Boolean lattice of subsets of a finite set and its rank levels, Graded poset, rank function, and rank levels) by the added element i∈{1,2,3}. This is an ordinary edge labeling (Finite lattice congruences, interval endpoints and descending rooted-chain labels), hence in particular a descending rooted-chain labeling, and it satisfies the no-tie condition and the lex-increasing property on every rooted interval of [∅,{1,2,3}].

The rank-three interval [∅,{1,2,3}] has exactly six maximal chains, with label words (read from the top) (1,2,3),(1,3,2),(2,1,3),(2,3,1),(3,1,2),(3,2,1); the unique increasing word is (1,2,3), so the increasing chain is {1,2,3}⋗{2,3}⋗{3}⋗∅, and the unique strictly falling chain is {1,2,3}⋗{1,2}⋗{1}⋗∅ with word (3,2,1). The facets of the order complex Δ((∅,{1,2,3})) (Face poset and order complex) are the six maximal chains of the open interval, namely the two-element chains {2,3}⊃{3}, {2,3}⊃{2}, {1,3}⊃{3}, {1,3}⊃{1}, {1,2}⊃{2} and {1,2}⊃{1} in the order induced by the label words above. The falling-chain formula of Lexicographic chain shelling and the falling-chain Möbius formula gives μ(∅,{1,2,3})=(−1)3⋅1=−1, which agrees with the Möbius recurrence on B3 (The integer-valued Möbius function μP of a locally finite poset, The Möbius recurrence: μP(x,x)=1 and both interval sums of μP vanish when x<y). The example also exhibits one replacement step of the shelling: for m′ with word (1,3,2) and m with word (2,1,3) one has λ(m′)≺λ(m), and the chain k with word (1,2,3) satisfies λ(k)≺λ(m), m′∩m⊆k∩m and ∣k∩m∣=3=∣m∣−1; the replaced two-step segment is {1,2,3}⋗{1,3}⋗{3} of m, with first-divergence and first-reunion analysis as in the proof of the shelling lemma.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Boolean lattice B3=P({1,2,3}) ordered by inclusion, with rank ∣S∣ and covers S⋖S∪{i} for i∉S (The Boolean lattice of subsets of a finite set and its rank levels), and the edge labeling that assigns to the cover S⋖S∪{i} the label i.

[F1]

For a finite set A the Boolean lattice B(A) is P(A) ordered by inclusion; T covers S exactly when T=S∪{a} for one a∈A∖S; the rank function is ∣S∣, and meet and join are intersection and union (The Boolean lattice of subsets of a finite set and its rank levels, Graded poset, rank function, and rank levels).

[F2]

A descending rooted-chain labeling of [x,y] labels each pair (c,v⋖w) of a descending chain c ending at w and a cover v⋖w; it is an ordinary edge labeling when the label does not depend on c. A maximal chain m of [x,y] is y=m0⋗⋯⋗mn=x with n=ρ(x,y), its word is λi(m)=λ(m0⋗⋯⋗mi−1;mi⋖mi−1), and in a rooted interval the root chain is kept fixed (Finite lattice congruences, interval endpoints and descending rooted-chain labels).

[F3]

(N): in every rooted interval the labels of any maximal chain are pairwise distinct. (L): in every rooted interval there is exactly one increasing maximal chain and its word is lexicographically first; the words are compared lexicographically (Finite lattice congruences, interval endpoints and descending rooted-chain labels).

[F4]

Shelling replacement: if m′,m are maximal chains of [x,y] with λ(m′)≺λ(m), there is a maximal chain k with λ(k)≺λ(m), m′∩m⊆k∩m and ∣k∩m∣=∣m∣−1 (Lexicographic chain shelling and the falling-chain Möbius formula (i)).

[F5]

Falling-chain formula: for every rooted interval of [x,y] one has μ(v,w)=(−1)ρ(v,w)#{strictly falling maximal chains} (Lexicographic chain shelling and the falling-chain Möbius formula (ii)).

[F6]

Faces of the order complex Δ(Q) are the finite chains of Q, so the facets are the maximal chains (Face poset and order complex).

[F7]

Möbius recurrence on a finite poset: μ(x,x)=1 and μ(x,y)=−∑x≤z<yμ(x,z) for x<y (The Möbius recurrence: μP(x,x)=1 and both interval sums of μP vanish when x<y, The integer-valued Möbius function μP of a locally finite poset).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2

The cover labeling is well defined and ordinary: by [F1] the covers of B3 are exactly the covers S⋖S∪{i} with i∉S, so the assignment is a labeling of all covers, and the label i of a cover depends only on that cover, not on any descending chain above it; hence it is an ordinary edge labeling and so, in particular, a descending rooted-chain labeling of [∅,{1,2,3}] in the sense of [F2].

1.2F1F2F3

(N) and (L). Let ∅⊆S⊆T⊆{1,2,3} and let m be a maximal chain of [S,T]; its steps add the elements of T∖S one at a time, so the labels on m are exactly the distinct elements of T∖S and are pairwise distinct, which is (N) for the rooted interval ([S,T],c). Every maximal chain of [S,T] corresponds to just such an order of adding the r:=∣T∖S∣ elements of T∖S, and its word read from the top is the reverse addition order; hence increasing words correspond exactly to adding the elements of T∖S in decreasing order, and the increasing arrangement of T∖S is the lexicographically first of the words; so there is exactly one increasing maximal chain, namely the one that adds the elements in decreasing order, and it is lexicographically first, which is (L). Since S,T and c were arbitrary, (N) and (L) hold on every rooted interval of [∅,{1,2,3}].

2.1F1step 1.2

The six maximal chains. A maximal chain of [∅,{1,2,3}] is an order of adding 1,2,3, and its word is the reverse of that order; hence there are exactly 6 maximal chains and their words are the six permutations, obtained as follows: adding 2,3,1 gives {1,2,3}⋗{2,3}⋗{2}⋗∅ with word (1,3,2); adding 3,1,2 gives {1,2,3}⋗{1,3}⋗{3}⋗∅ with word (2,1,3); adding 1,3,2 gives {1,2,3}⋗{1,3}⋗{1}⋗∅ with word (2,3,1); adding 2,1,3 gives {1,2,3}⋗{1,2}⋗{2}⋗∅ with word (3,1,2); adding 1,2,3 gives {1,2,3}⋗{1,2}⋗{1}⋗∅ with word (3,2,1); and adding 3,2,1 gives {1,2,3}⋗{2,3}⋗{3}⋗∅ with word (1,2,3). Among the six permutations only (1,2,3) is increasing and only (3,2,1) is (strictly) falling, so the increasing chain is {1,2,3}⋗{2,3}⋗{3}⋗∅ and the strictly falling chain is {1,2,3}⋗{1,2}⋗{1}⋗∅, as stated.

3.1F6step 2.1

Facets of the open interval. By [F6] the facets of Δ((∅,{1,2,3})) are the maximal chains of the open interval, that is, the sets obtained from the six maximal chains of step 2.1 by deleting the two endpoints: (1,2,3)↦{2,3}⊃{3}, (1,3,2)↦{2,3}⊃{2}, (2,1,3)↦{1,3}⊃{3}, (2,3,1)↦{1,3}⊃{1}, (3,1,2)↦{1,2}⊃{2} and (3,2,1)↦{1,2}⊃{1}, ordered by the words of their parent chains: this is the list of six two-element chains in the stated order.

3.2F5F7step 2.1

The Möbius value. Since (3,2,1) is the only falling word among the six by step 2.1, the falling-chain formula of [F5] gives μ(∅,{1,2,3})=(−1)3⋅1=−1 in B3. The recurrence [F7] gives μ(∅,∅)=1, μ(∅,{i})=−μ(∅,∅)=−1 for each singleton, μ(∅,{i,j})=−(μ(∅,∅)+μ(∅,{i})+μ(∅,{j}))=−(1−1−1)=1 for each two-element subset, and μ(∅,{1,2,3})=−(1+3⋅(−1)+3⋅1)=−1, in agreement with the formula.

4.1F4step 2.1step 3.1

The replacement step. Take m′ the chain with word (1,3,2), namely {1,2,3}⋗{2,3}⋗{2}⋗∅, and m the chain with word (2,1,3), namely {1,2,3}⋗{1,3}⋗{3}⋗∅; then λ(m′)≺λ(m). The first divergence is at index 1 and the first reunion at index 3, so d=0, g=3, the window word of m is (2,1,3), and m′ and m share exactly the vertices {1,2,3} and ∅, i.e. m′∩m={{1,2,3},∅}. The window word has its descent at position e=1: λ1(m)=2>1=λ2(m); the rooted rank-two interval ([{3},{1,2,3}],{1,2,3}) has the two maximal chains {1,2,3}⋗{1,3}⋗{3} and {1,2,3}⋗{2,3}⋗{3} with words (2,1) and (1,2), so the increasing one is {1,2,3}⋗{2,3}⋗{3} and replacing the segment {1,2,3}⋗{1,3}⋗{3} of m by it gives k={1,2,3}⋗{2,3}⋗{3}⋗∅, the chain with word (1,2,3). Then λ(k)=(1,2,3)≺(2,1,3)=λ(m), the intersection k∩m={{1,2,3},{3},∅} has ∣k∩m∣=3=∣m∣−1, and m′∩m={{1,2,3},∅}⊆k∩m; the replaced two-step segment is {1,2,3}⋗{1,3}⋗{3}, as in the shelling lemma [F4].

5.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 3.2∎

The computations verify every claim of the Example: the element-added cover labeling is an ordinary edge labeling and hence a descending rooted-chain labeling; it satisfies (N) and (L) on every rooted interval of [∅,{1,2,3}]; the six maximal chains have the six permutation words, with ({1,2,3}⋗{2,3}⋗{3}⋗∅) the unique increasing chain and ({1,2,3}⋗{1,2}⋗{1}⋗∅) the unique strictly falling chain; the facets of Δ((∅,{1,2,3})) are the six listed two-element chains in the stated order; the exhibited chain k realizes the shelling replacement for the pair (1,3,2)≺(2,1,3); and the falling-chain formula returns μ(∅,{1,2,3})=−1, which the recurrence confirms.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources