How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A rank-three chain labeling translated into facets of the order complex
Example
Label each cover of the Boolean lattice (The Boolean lattice of subsets of a finite set and its rank levels, Graded poset, rank function, and rank levels) by the added element . This is an ordinary edge labeling (Finite lattice congruences, interval endpoints and descending rooted-chain labels), hence in particular a descending rooted-chain labeling, and it satisfies the no-tie condition and the lex-increasing property on every rooted interval of .
The rank-three interval has exactly six maximal chains, with label words (read from the top) ; the unique increasing word is , so the increasing chain is , and the unique strictly falling chain is with word . The facets of the order complex (Face poset and order complex) are the six maximal chains of the open interval, namely the two-element chains , , , , and in the order induced by the label words above. The falling-chain formula of Lexicographic chain shelling and the falling-chain Möbius formula gives , which agrees with the Möbius recurrence on (The integer-valued Möbius function of a locally finite poset, The Möbius recurrence: and both interval sums of vanish when ). The example also exhibits one replacement step of the shelling: for with word and with word one has , and the chain with word satisfies , and ; the replaced two-step segment is of , with first-divergence and first-reunion analysis as in the proof of the shelling lemma.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Boolean lattice ordered by inclusion, with rank and covers for (The Boolean lattice of subsets of a finite set and its rank levels), and the edge labeling that assigns to the cover the label .
For a finite set the Boolean lattice is ordered by inclusion; covers exactly when for one ; the rank function is , and meet and join are intersection and union (The Boolean lattice of subsets of a finite set and its rank levels, Graded poset, rank function, and rank levels).
A descending rooted-chain labeling of labels each pair of a descending chain ending at and a cover ; it is an ordinary edge labeling when the label does not depend on . A maximal chain of is with , its word is , and in a rooted interval the root chain is kept fixed (Finite lattice congruences, interval endpoints and descending rooted-chain labels).
(N): in every rooted interval the labels of any maximal chain are pairwise distinct. (L): in every rooted interval there is exactly one increasing maximal chain and its word is lexicographically first; the words are compared lexicographically (Finite lattice congruences, interval endpoints and descending rooted-chain labels).
Shelling replacement: if are maximal chains of with , there is a maximal chain with , and (Lexicographic chain shelling and the falling-chain Möbius formula (i)).
Falling-chain formula: for every rooted interval of one has strictly falling maximal chains (Lexicographic chain shelling and the falling-chain Möbius formula (ii)).
Faces of the order complex are the finite chains of , so the facets are the maximal chains (Face poset and order complex).
Möbius recurrence on a finite poset: and for (The Möbius recurrence: and both interval sums of vanish when , The integer-valued Möbius function of a locally finite poset).
Proof
The cover labeling is well defined and ordinary: by [F1] the covers of are exactly the covers with , so the assignment is a labeling of all covers, and the label of a cover depends only on that cover, not on any descending chain above it; hence it is an ordinary edge labeling and so, in particular, a descending rooted-chain labeling of in the sense of [F2].
(N) and (L). Let and let be a maximal chain of ; its steps add the elements of one at a time, so the labels on are exactly the distinct elements of and are pairwise distinct, which is (N) for the rooted interval . Every maximal chain of corresponds to just such an order of adding the elements of , and its word read from the top is the reverse addition order; hence increasing words correspond exactly to adding the elements of in decreasing order, and the increasing arrangement of is the lexicographically first of the words; so there is exactly one increasing maximal chain, namely the one that adds the elements in decreasing order, and it is lexicographically first, which is (L). Since and were arbitrary, (N) and (L) hold on every rooted interval of .
The six maximal chains. A maximal chain of is an order of adding , and its word is the reverse of that order; hence there are exactly maximal chains and their words are the six permutations, obtained as follows: adding gives with word ; adding gives with word ; adding gives with word ; adding gives with word ; adding gives with word ; and adding gives with word . Among the six permutations only is increasing and only is (strictly) falling, so the increasing chain is and the strictly falling chain is , as stated.
Facets of the open interval. By [F6] the facets of are the maximal chains of the open interval, that is, the sets obtained from the six maximal chains of step 2.1 by deleting the two endpoints: , , , , and , ordered by the words of their parent chains: this is the list of six two-element chains in the stated order.
The Möbius value. Since is the only falling word among the six by step 2.1, the falling-chain formula of [F5] gives in . The recurrence [F7] gives , for each singleton, for each two-element subset, and , in agreement with the formula.
The replacement step. Take the chain with word , namely , and the chain with word , namely ; then . The first divergence is at index and the first reunion at index , so , , the window word of is , and and share exactly the vertices and , i.e. . The window word has its descent at position : ; the rooted rank-two interval has the two maximal chains and with words and , so the increasing one is and replacing the segment of by it gives , the chain with word . Then , the intersection has , and ; the replaced two-step segment is , as in the shelling lemma [F4].
The computations verify every claim of the Example: the element-added cover labeling is an ordinary edge labeling and hence a descending rooted-chain labeling; it satisfies (N) and (L) on every rooted interval of ; the six maximal chains have the six permutation words, with the unique increasing chain and the unique strictly falling chain; the facets of are the six listed two-element chains in the stated order; the exhibited chain realizes the shelling replacement for the pair ; and the falling-chain formula returns , which the recurrence confirms.
Depends on
- Lexicographic chain shelling and the falling-chain Möbius formula
- Finite lattice congruences, interval endpoints and descending rooted-chain labels
- The Boolean lattice of subsets of a finite set and its rank levels
- Graded poset, rank function, and rank levels
- Face poset and order complex
- The integer-valued Möbius function $\mu_P$ of a locally finite poset
- The Möbius recurrence: $\mu_P(x,x)=1$ and both interval sums of $\mu_P$ vanish when $x<y$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard P. Stanley, An Introduction to Hyperplane Arrangements, Lecture 1 §1.2 and Lecture 4 §4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michelle L. Wachs, Poset topology: tools and applications, PCMI lecture notes, Lecture 3 §§3.1–3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)