Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Left and right coset minima and a double coset decomposition in S4

Example

Let W=S4 with simple reflections s1=(1 2), s2=(2 3), s3=(3 4), so that m(si,sj)=3 if ∣i−j∣=1 and =2 if ∣i−j∣=2 (Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups). Write permutations in one-line notation, so that s1=2134, s2=1324, s3=1243, and ℓ(w) is the inversion number (Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification (4)). Fix I={s1,s2}, J={s2,s3} and, for K⊆I, let WIK={u∈WI:ℓ(us)>ℓ(u) for all s∈K}.

(i) The parabolics. WI={w:w(4)=4}={1234,1324,2134,2314,3124,3214} and WJ={w:w(1)=1}={1234,1243,1324,1342,1423,1432}, both of order 6, and WI∩WJ=WI∩J=W{s2}={1234,1324} (Intersections of standard parabolics, the parabolic root subsystem, and global minimality of coset representatives (1)).

(ii) The quotients. WJ={w:ℓ(wsi)>ℓ(w) (i=2,3)}={1234,2134,3124,4123}, IW={w:ℓ(siw)>ℓ(w) (i=1,2)}={1234,1243,1423,4123}, and IWJ={1234,4123}; hence S4 is the disjoint union of exactly two double cosets WIwWJ (Unique minimal double coset representatives and the additive normal form u-d-v (1)).

(iii) The two double cosets. The double coset WI 1234 WJ has 18 elements, minimum d=1234 (length 0) and K={s2} with WIK={1234,2134,3124}; the double coset WI 4123 WJ has 6 elements, minimum d=4123 (length 3) and K={s1,s2} with WIK={1234}. In both cases ∣WIwWJ∣=∣WIK∣⋅∣WJ∣, and 18=6⋅6/2, 6=6⋅6/6 in agreement with Unique minimal double coset representatives and the additive normal form u-d-v (2),(3).

(iv) Coset minima and a normal form of a single element. For w=2143 (so ℓ(w)=2): the element of minimum length in WIw is 1243 (of length 1), the element of minimum length in wWJ is 2134 (of length 1), and the double coset WIwWJ has minimum d=1234 and normal form

2143=2134⋅1234⋅1243,ℓ(2134)+ℓ(1234)+ℓ(1243)=1+0+1=2=ℓ(2143),

with 2134∈WIK for K={s2} and 1243∈WJ (Unique minimal double coset representatives and the additive normal form u-d-v (2)).

(v) A second pair of parabolics. For I={s1} and J={s3} one has IWJ={1234,1324,1423,3124,3412,4123,4312} (7 elements), the seven double cosets have sizes 4,4,4,4,4,2,2 and minima 1234,1324,1423,3124,4123,3412,4312 respectively, and the associated sets are K=∅ for the first five minima and K={s1} for d=3412 and d=4312 (so WIK={1,s1} or WIK={1} respectively); for instance

WI 3412 WJ={3412,3421},WI 4123 WJ={4123,4132,4213,4231}.

This exhibits a case where K varies with d and ∣WIwWJ∣ is not constant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Coxeter group W of type A3 with S={s1,s2,s3}, identified with S4 by si↦(i i+1) and one-line notation for permutations, the subsets I={s1,s2}, J={s2,s3}, and the sets WIK, IWJ of the statement.

[F1]

The assignment si↦(i i+1) extends to an isomorphism W→S4 with ℓ(w)=inv⁡(φ(w)); for J⊆S one has WJ={w∈W:S(w)⊆J} and WJ∩S=J, and (WJ,J) is the Coxeter system for the restricted matrix, with intrinsic length equal to the ambient length (Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification).

[F2]

WI={w:S(w)⊆I} for a standard parabolic, WJ={w:ℓ(ws)>ℓ(w) for all s∈J}, IW={w:ℓ(sw)>ℓ(w) for all s∈I} and IWJ=IW∩WJ (Standard parabolic subgroups, descent-free one- and two-sided representatives, parabolic and reflection subgroups).

[F4]

Every double coset WIwWJ contains exactly one element of IWJ, its unique minimum; if d is that element and K=I∩dJd−1, then every x∈WIdWJ has a unique representation x=udv with u∈WIK, v∈WJ and ℓ(x)=ℓ(u)+ℓ(d)+ℓ(v), and ∣WIdWJ∣=∣WIK∣⋅∣WJ∣, which for finite WI equals ∣WI∣∣WJ∣/∣WK∣ (Unique minimal double coset representatives and the additive normal form u-d-v).

[F5]

For d∈IWJ the subset K={s∈I:d−1sd∈J} satisfies WI∩dWJd−1=WK (The parabolic intersection W_I cap dW_Jd inverse for d in ^IW^J).

[F6]

For every d∈WI and u∈WI one has ℓ(du)=ℓ(d)+ℓ(u); dually ℓ(ud)=ℓ(u)+ℓ(d) for d∈IW and u∈WI (Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification).

Verification

technique · direct finite computations in $S_4$, with the coset and double coset theory of the listed suppliers
1.1F1F2F3

The two parabolics and their intersection. By [F1] the group WI=⟨s1,s2⟩ is the type-A2 Coxeter group, of order 6, consisting of the permutations of {1,2,3} extended by 4↦4, i.e. the permutations with w(4)=4: the six elements are 1234, s1=2134, s2=1324, s1s2=2314, s2s1=3124 and s1s2s1=s2s1s2=3214. Likewise WJ=⟨s2,s3⟩ consists of the permutations with w(1)=1: 1234, s3=1243, s2=1324, s2s3=1342, s3s2=1423 and s2s3s2=1432. Their intersection is {1234,1324}=W{s2}=WI∩J by [F3].

1.2F1F2F4

The quotients and the two double cosets. Right multiplication by si swaps the entries of the one-line form in positions i and i+1, so it changes the inversion number by ±1, and decreases it exactly when those two entries are in decreasing order, that is when w(i)>w(i+1); by [F1] the same holds for ℓ. Left multiplication by si swaps the values i and i+1 wherever they occur, so it decreases the inversion number exactly when the value i occurs after the value i+1, that is when w−1(i)>w−1(i+1). Hence w∈WJ iff w(2)<w(3) and w(3)<w(4), which for the 24 permutations gives WJ={1234,2134,3124,4123}, and w∈IW iff w−1(1)<w−1(2) and w−1(2)<w−1(3), which gives IW={1234,1243,1423,4123}. Intersecting, IWJ={1234,4123}. By [F4] each double coset contains exactly one element of IWJ, so the two double cosets WI 1234 WJ and WI 4123 WJ are distinct and their union is all of S4.

1.3F1F2F4F5algebra

The second pair of parabolics. Now I={s1}, J={s3}, so WI={1234,2134} and WJ={1234,1243}. An element lies in IW iff w−1(1)<w−1(2) (the value 1 occurs before the value 2), and in WJ iff w(3)<w(4); listing the 24 permutations gives IWJ={1234,1324,1423,3124,3412,4123,4312}, seven elements, hence seven double cosets by [F4]. Computing each double coset WIdWJ by multiplying the two generators on the left and right gives sizes 4,4,4,4,4,2,2 for the minima 1234,1324,1423,3124,4123,3412,4312; for the last two minima d=3412 and d=4312 one computes d−1s1d=s3 in both cases, so K={s1} and WIK={1} there, while for the first five minima d−1s1d∉{s3}, so K=∅ and WIK={1,s1}; the sizes agree with ∣WIK∣⋅∣WJ∣=4 and 2. Explicitly, WI 3412 WJ={3412,3421} and WI 4123 WJ={4123,4132,4213,4231}.

2.1F1F4F5step 1.1step 1.2algebra

The two double cosets of part (iii). For the pair I={s1,s2}, J={s2,s3}, listing the products udv with u∈WI, v∈WJ gives WI 1234 WJ of order 18 and WI 4123 WJ of order 6, with 18+6=24; by step 1.2 these two sets cover S4 and are disjoint, and by [F4] their minima are 1234 and 4123. For d=1234 one has d−1sid=si, so K={s1,s2}∩{s2,s3}={s2}, and the right-descent test ℓ(us2)>ℓ(u) selects WIK={1234,2134,3124} from WI; for d=4123 one computes d−1s1d=s2 and d−1s2d=s3, both of which lie in J, so K={s1,s2} and WIK={1234}. The sizes match ∣WIK∣⋅∣WJ∣=3⋅6=18 and 1⋅6=6, and the finite formula gives 18=6⋅6/2 and 6=6⋅6/6, since ∣WK∣=∣{1,s2}∣=2 and ∣WK∣=∣WI∣=6 respectively.

3.1F1F4F6step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

Coset minima and the normal form of 2143. Let w=2143, of length 2 by [F1]. Multiplying the six elements of WI into w gives WIw={1243,1342,2143,2341,3142,3241}, whose element of least length is 1243=s3, of length 1, and this is the unique element of IW in the right coset by step 1.2; multiplying the six elements of WJ on the right gives wWJ={2134,2143,2314,2341,2413,2431}, whose element of least length is 2134=s1, of length 1, the unique element of WJ in the left coset by step 1.2. Since 2143=2134⋅1243 and 2134∈WI, 1243∈WJ, the element 2143 lies in the double coset of d=1234, whose minimum is 1234 by step 2.1; the representation in the normal form of [F4] for K={s2} is 2143=2134⋅1234⋅1243, with 2134∈WIK={1234,2134,3124} by step 2.1 and 1243∈WJ, and the lengths add: ℓ(2134)+ℓ(1234)+ℓ(1243)=1+0+1=2=ℓ(2143), in agreement with [F4] and [F6]. This completes the example.

Remarks

  • The example shows that both transversals are needed to reach the minimum of a double coset: for w=2143 the left minimum 1243 and the right minimum 2134 are different elements, and the double coset minimum 1234 is neither of them.
  • In part (v) the set K is not determined by the pair (I,J) alone: it depends on the minimum d, which is why The parabolic intersection W_I cap dW_Jd inverse for d in ^IW^J recomputes it for each double coset.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources