How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Left and right coset minima and a double coset decomposition in S4
Example
Let with simple reflections , , , so that if and if (Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups). Write permutations in one-line notation, so that , , , and is the inversion number (Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification (4)). Fix , and, for , let .
(i) The parabolics. and , both of order , and (Intersections of standard parabolics, the parabolic root subsystem, and global minimality of coset representatives (1)).
(ii) The quotients. , , and ; hence is the disjoint union of exactly two double cosets (Unique minimal double coset representatives and the additive normal form u-d-v (1)).
(iii) The two double cosets. The double coset has elements, minimum (length ) and with ; the double coset has elements, minimum (length ) and with . In both cases , and , in agreement with Unique minimal double coset representatives and the additive normal form u-d-v (2),(3).
(iv) Coset minima and a normal form of a single element. For (so ): the element of minimum length in is (of length ), the element of minimum length in is (of length ), and the double coset has minimum and normal form
with for and (Unique minimal double coset representatives and the additive normal form u-d-v (2)).
(v) A second pair of parabolics. For and one has ( elements), the seven double cosets have sizes and minima respectively, and the associated sets are for the first five minima and for and (so or respectively); for instance
This exhibits a case where varies with and is not constant.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Coxeter group of type with , identified with by and one-line notation for permutations, the subsets , , and the sets , of the statement.
The assignment extends to an isomorphism with ; for one has and , and is the Coxeter system for the restricted matrix, with intrinsic length equal to the ambient length (Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification).
for a standard parabolic, , and (Standard parabolic subgroups, descent-free one- and two-sided representatives, parabolic and reflection subgroups).
Every double coset contains exactly one element of , its unique minimum; if is that element and , then every has a unique representation with , and , and , which for finite equals (Unique minimal double coset representatives and the additive normal form u-d-v).
For the subset satisfies (The parabolic intersection W_I cap dW_Jd inverse for d in ^IW^J).
For every and one has ; dually for and (Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification).
Verification
The two parabolics and their intersection. By [F1] the group is the type- Coxeter group, of order , consisting of the permutations of extended by , i.e. the permutations with : the six elements are , , , , and . Likewise consists of the permutations with : , , , , and . Their intersection is by [F3].
The quotients and the two double cosets. Right multiplication by swaps the entries of the one-line form in positions and , so it changes the inversion number by , and decreases it exactly when those two entries are in decreasing order, that is when ; by [F1] the same holds for . Left multiplication by swaps the values and wherever they occur, so it decreases the inversion number exactly when the value occurs after the value , that is when . Hence iff and , which for the permutations gives , and iff and , which gives . Intersecting, . By [F4] each double coset contains exactly one element of , so the two double cosets and are distinct and their union is all of .
The second pair of parabolics. Now , , so and . An element lies in iff (the value occurs before the value ), and in iff ; listing the permutations gives , seven elements, hence seven double cosets by [F4]. Computing each double coset by multiplying the two generators on the left and right gives sizes for the minima ; for the last two minima and one computes in both cases, so and there, while for the first five minima , so and ; the sizes agree with and . Explicitly, and .
The two double cosets of part (iii). For the pair , , listing the products with , gives of order and of order , with ; by step 1.2 these two sets cover and are disjoint, and by [F4] their minima are and . For one has , so , and the right-descent test selects from ; for one computes and , both of which lie in , so and . The sizes match and , and the finite formula gives and , since and respectively.
Coset minima and the normal form of . Let , of length by [F1]. Multiplying the six elements of into gives , whose element of least length is , of length , and this is the unique element of in the right coset by step 1.2; multiplying the six elements of on the right gives , whose element of least length is , of length , the unique element of in the left coset by step 1.2. Since and , , the element lies in the double coset of , whose minimum is by step 2.1; the representation in the normal form of [F4] for is , with by step 2.1 and , and the lengths add: , in agreement with [F4] and [F6]. This completes the example.
Remarks
- The example shows that both transversals are needed to reach the minimum of a double coset: for the left minimum and the right minimum are different elements, and the double coset minimum is neither of them.
- In part (v) the set is not determined by the pair alone: it depends on the minimum , which is why The parabolic intersection W_I cap dW_Jd inverse for d in ^IW^J recomputes it for each double coset.
Depends on
- Standard parabolic subgroups, descent-free one- and two-sided representatives, parabolic and reflection subgroups
- Intersections of standard parabolics, the parabolic root subsystem, and global minimality of coset representatives
- Unique minimal double coset representatives and the additive normal form u-d-v
- The parabolic intersection W_I cap dW_Jd inverse for d in ^IW^J
- Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups
- Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anders Bjorner and Francesco Brenti, Combinatorics of Coxeter Groups (Graduate Texts in Mathematics 231, Springer 2005; author-hosted complete PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sara Billey, Matjaz Konvalinka, T. Kyle Petersen, William Slofstra and Bridget Tenner, Parabolic double cosets in Coxeter groups (arXiv:1612.00736v2) (standard reference, not scraped)
- George Lusztig, Hecke Algebras with Unequal Parameters (revised arXiv edition of the CRM monograph, arXiv:math/0208154v2) (standard reference, not scraped)