Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Type-A Artin projections, positive lifts, and the positive braid monoid

Example

Let n≥2, S={s1,…,sn−1} and let m be the type-An−1 Coxeter matrix on S: m(si,si)=1, m(si,sj)=3 when ∣i−j∣=1, and m(si,sj)=2 when ∣i−j∣>1. Let W be the presented Coxeter group with length ℓ, let Gn:=A(S,m) and Gn+:=A+(S,m) be the Artin group and monoid of Artin monoid and Artin group presentations, and the canonical monoid-to-group map, and let π:Gn→W, π+:Gn+→W, γ, σi:=σsi and bw be as in Universal properties of the Artin monoid and group, the projection onto the Coxeter group, and the quotient by the squares and The reduced positive section b_w, its length additivity, and the degree homomorphism. By the type-A clause of Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification (4), si↦(i i+1) extends to an isomorphism W→Sn (The finite symmetric group Sn, one-line notation, and cycle notation) with ℓ(w)=inv⁡(w), the inversion number (Inversions, inversion number, the sign sgn⁡(σ)=(−1)inv⁡(σ), and even and odd permutations).

Throughout, relabel the library's underlying set {0,…,n−1} as {1,…,n} by k↦k+1, as in that supplier. Cycle symbols, one-line lists and inversion positions below use these transported labels; the order-preserving relabelling leaves inversion numbers unchanged.

  1. The Artin-to-symmetric map. Composing with that isomorphism, si↦(i i+1) extends to a surjective homomorphism

πn:Gn⟶Sn,πn(σi)=(i i+1),

with πn(σi1⋯σik)=si1⋯sik for every word; the same assignment on the generators gives a monoid homomorphism πn+:Gn+→Sn with πn∘γ=πn+. Surjectivity holds because the adjacent transpositions generate Sn (the existence follows from the universal property (2) of Universal properties of the Artin monoid and group, the projection onto the Coxeter group, and the quotient by the squares, since the braid words of the type-A matrix are equal in Sn).

  1. Positive lifts. For w∈Sn the element bw=σi1⋯σik of any reduced expression is well defined, satisfies πn+(bw)=w, and the map w↦bw is injective (The reduced positive section b_w, its length additivity, and the degree homomorphism (1),(2)). For instance, when n≥3,

bs1s2=σ1σ2,bs1bs2=σ1σ2=bs1s2

because inv⁡(s1s2)=2=1+1, an instance of the length-additive case of The reduced positive section b_w, its length additivity, and the degree homomorphism (4).

  1. Two reduced expressions of the longest element. For n=3, w0=(1 3)=s1s2s1=s2s1s2 has ℓ(w0)=3=inv⁡(w0), and the two reduced expressions are related by the braid move σ1σ2σ1=σ2σ1σ2 in G3, so

bw0=σ1σ2σ1=σ2σ1σ2,

a nonempty instance of the independence clause (1) of The reduced positive section b_w, its length additivity, and the degree homomorphism.

  1. Positive braid monoid. For the same standard type-An−1 indexing, the generators and positive braid relations of Gn+ agree exactly with the presentation of Bn+ in Positive braid monoid. Thus the assignment σi↦σ‾i gives a monoid isomorphism Gn+≅Bn+ by the quotient universal properties. This is only an identification by positive presentations; it does not assert that Bn+ embeds in Gn or construct a geometric braid monoid.

  2. Scope. This example proves only the stated presentation-level maps, lifts and finite calculations. It constructs no topological model, proves no Garside or lattice property, and makes no claim about the embedding of the positive monoid into the group. The type-A group identification with geometric braids is the separate conditional application in A2, using its independently published completeness theorem. The failure of b to be multiplicative is the companion counterexample.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer n≥2, the type-An−1 Coxeter matrix on S={s1,…,sn−1}, the group W with length ℓ, and the constructions Gn=A(S,m), Gn+=A+(S,m), γ, σi and bw of the items named in the statement, together with the isomorphism W→Sn, si↦(i i+1), of the type-A clause (4) of Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification.

[F1]

A map f:S→M into a monoid whose values on the two words of every braid pair agree extends uniquely to a monoid homomorphism fˉ:A+→M with fˉ(σs)=f(s). (Universal properties of the Artin monoid and group, the projection onto the Coxeter group, and the quotient by the squares)

[F2]

A map f:S→G into a group whose values on the two words of every braid pair agree extends uniquely to a group homomorphism fˉ:A→G with fˉ(σs)=f(s). (Universal properties of the Artin monoid and group, the projection onto the Coxeter group, and the quotient by the squares)

[F3]

bw is well defined independently of the reduced expression, b1=[ε], and π+(bw)=w. (The reduced positive section b_w, its length additivity, and the degree homomorphism)

[F4]

π+∘b=idW and π∘γ∘b=idW, hence b is injective and is a set-theoretic section. (The reduced positive section b_w, its length additivity, and the degree homomorphism)

[F5]

bubv=buv if and only if ℓ(uv)=ℓ(u)+ℓ(v). (The reduced positive section b_w, its length additivity, and the degree homomorphism)

[F6]

For n≥2 the symmetric group has the presentation with generators si=(i i+1) and relations si2=1, sisi+1si=si+1sisi+1 and sisj=sjsi for ∣i−j∣>1. (The symmetric group has the Coxeter presentation)

[F7]

For n≥2 the adjacent transpositions sj=(j j+1) generate Sn. Generation follows directly from the zero-indexed adjacent-swap proof of Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification (4). The repaired Adjacent transpositions generate the finite symmetric group Sn also proves generation in exactly the transported one-based model fixed above; the direct argument here remains valid.

[F8]

In the transported one-based model fixed above, an inversion of σ∈Sn is a pair (i,j) with 1≤i<j≤n and σ(i)>σ(j), and inv⁡(σ) is the number of inversions. (Inversions, inversion number, the sign sgn⁡(σ)=(−1)inv⁡(σ), and even and odd permutations)

[F9]

Let M be a monoid and a1,…,an−1∈M satisfy aiai+1ai=ai+1aiai+1 and aiaj=ajai for ∣i−j∣>1; then there is exactly one monoid homomorphism φ:Bn+→M with φ(σ‾i)=ai. (Positive braid monoid)

[F10]

The subgroup generated by a set is contained in every subgroup containing that set. (The subgroup ⟨S⟩ generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup ⟨g⟩, and cyclic groups)

Verification

1.1F2F6F7F10

The braid pairs of the type-An−1 matrix are the pairs of alternating words {sisi+1si, si+1sisi+1} for ∣i−j∣=1 and the commuting pairs {sisj, sjsi} for ∣i−j∣>1; their images under f(si):=(i i+1) are equal in Sn by the presentation of [F6]. Hence [F2] gives a homomorphism πn:Gn→Sn with πn(σi)=(i i+1). Its image is a subgroup of Sn containing the adjacent transpositions, which generate Sn by [F7], so the image is all of Sn by [F10]: πn is surjective.

1.2F1F9

The monoid isomorphism Gn+≅Bn+: define φ:Gn+→Bn+ on generators by φ(σi):=σ‾i. The braid pairs of the type-A matrix map to the two defining word pairs of Bn+ of [F9], whose two members are ≡+-equivalent in Bn+, so [F1] gives a monoid homomorphism φ. Conversely the elements ai:=σi∈Gn+ satisfy aiai+1ai=ai+1aiai+1 and aiaj=ajai for ∣i−j∣>1, because the corresponding alternating words are ≡+-equivalent in A+(S,m) and hence equal in Gn+; so [F9] gives a monoid homomorphism ψ:Bn+→Gn+ with ψ(σ‾i)=σi. The composites φ∘ψ and ψ∘φ fix every generator, hence are the respective identities by the uniqueness clauses of [F1] and [F9]; thus φ and ψ are mutually inverse isomorphisms.

2.1F1step 1.1

The same assignment f(si):=(i i+1) has equal values on the two words of every braid pair by [F6], so [F1] with M=Sn gives a monoid homomorphism πn+:Gn+→Sn with πn+(σi)=(i i+1). The composites πn∘γ and πn+ are monoid homomorphisms Gn+→Sn agreeing on every generator σi, so they are equal by the uniqueness clause of [F1]: πn∘γ=πn+.

3.1F3F4step 2.1

The map b:Sn→Gn+ is well defined by the type-A isomorphism of the given data: its input w∈Sn corresponds to the unique element of W with the same name, and [F3] applies. It satisfies πn+(bw)=w by [F3], and πn∘γ∘b=idSn because πn∘γ=πn+ by step 2.1 and πn+∘b=id by [F4]; in particular b is injective by [F4] and is a set-theoretic section of both πn+ and πn∘γ.

4.1F5F8step 3.1

For n≥3, the element s1s2 permutes the first three symbols as in S3 and fixes the others; it corresponds to (1 2)(2 3)=(1 2 3), whose one-line form is [2,3,1,4,…,n] (with no tail when n=3); the pairs (1,3) and (2,3) are its only inversions: (1,2) is not an inversion and all pairs involving the increasing tail contribute none, so inv⁡(s1s2)=2 by [F8]. By the given type-A clause ℓ(s1s2)=2 while ℓ(s1)=ℓ(s2)=1, so ℓ(s1s2)=ℓ(s1)+ℓ(s2) and [F5] gives bs1bs2=bs1s2; explicitly both sides equal σ1σ2, and no braid move is needed for this pair.

4.2F8step 3.1

For n=3, the two words s1s2s1 and s2s1s2 both act as the transposition (1 3), whose one-line form [3,2,1] has all three pairs as inversions, so inv⁡(w0)=3 by [F8]; with ℓ(w0)=3 by the given type-A clause, both words have length ℓ(w0) and hence are reduced expressions of w0. Step 3.1 therefore gives bw0 as the product along either word, and the two products are equal in G3 because σ1σ2σ1 and σ2σ1σ2 are the two words of a braid pair of A(S,m), hence equal in G3+ and in G3.

5.1given∎

Scope and choice: only presentation-level maps, the positive monoid isomorphism and the displayed finite computations are proved; no topological model, no Garside or lattice property, and no embedding of Gn+ into Gn or Bn+ into Bn is asserted. All constructions are given on generators of explicitly presented monoids and groups, and no choice is used.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources