How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For large , the log-log choice of still leaves a dense-or-sparse set of order at least
Example
Fix a finite graph , let be the constant from Bucić–Nguyen–Scott–Seymour: a log-log quantitative density theorem ‡, and let be an -free graph on vertices. Write , and set and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data in the Example.
For , every -free -vertex graph has a vertex set of order at least whose induced graph or complement has at most edges (Bucić–Nguyen–Scott–Seymour: a log-log quantitative density theorem ‡).
Verification
For the chosen , one has .
For all sufficiently large , the inequality holds. Hence and .
Hence, for all sufficiently large , , and therefore .
So for all sufficiently large , this choice of still leaves a dense-or-sparse set of order at least .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Matija Bucić, Tung Nguyen, Alex Scott, and Paul Seymour, Induced subgraph density. I. A loglog step towards Erdős-Hajnal, Theorem 1.8 (standard reference, not scraped)