How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A closed convex program with a positive duality gap when Slater fails
Example
Define the extended-real perspective
Minimize subject to . Both functions are proper closed convex, the primal minimum is , Slater fails, and the Lagrangian dual value is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The perspective , objective , and the single inequality constraint .
A proper closed convex function is specified by its closed convex epigraph; the Lagrangian dual uses (Finite-dimensional convex program, Lagrangian dual, and Slater condition).
Weak duality gives , while Slater plus finite attained primal value would give equality and an attained dual certificate (Every Lagrangian dual feasible pair is a lower-bound certificate, Slater gives zero duality gap and an attained dual certificate).
Verification
The epigraph of is exactly . For this is the inequality ; when it forces and ; for it is empty. Thus is closed, being defined by continuous non-strict inequalities. It is convex: if for , then for , by Cauchy–Schwarz. Therefore is closed convex. The objective is continuous and has second derivative in , so it is closed convex and proper as well.
On its domain . If , forces ; if , finiteness already forces . Hence the feasible set is and throughout it, so and the primal minimum is attained, for example at . No point has , so Slater fails.
For , every point in the Lagrangian domain has , so . At , taking gives . For , take ; then , so again . Therefore and the positive duality gap is . This does not contradict [F2], because its Slater hypothesis fails.
The calculation gives a closed convex primal problem with attained finite optimum and a strict gap; the missing strict-feasibility condition is exactly the boundary that blocks the Slater theorem's certificate.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Zhiyuan Li, Convex Optimization, Lecture 5: Lagrange Multipliers and KKT (standard reference, not scraped)
- Boyd and Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization (standard reference, not scraped)