Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A closed convex program with a positive duality gap when Slater fails

Example

Define the extended-real perspective

ϕ(x,y)={x2/y,y>0,0,(x,y)=(0,0),+∞,otherwise.

Minimize f0(x,y)=e−x subject to ϕ(x,y)≤0. Both functions are proper closed convex, the primal minimum is 1, Slater fails, and the Lagrangian dual value is 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The perspective ϕ, objective f0, and the single inequality constraint ϕ≤0.

[F1]

A proper closed convex function is specified by its closed convex epigraph; the Lagrangian dual uses q(λ)=inf⁡(x,y)∈dom⁡f0∩dom⁡ϕ(f0(x,y)+λϕ(x,y)) (Finite-dimensional convex program, Lagrangian dual, and Slater condition).

[F2]

Weak duality gives d∗≤p∗, while Slater plus finite attained primal value would give equality and an attained dual certificate (Every Lagrangian dual feasible pair is a lower-bound certificate, Slater gives zero duality gap and an attained dual certificate).

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

The epigraph of ϕ is exactly E={(x,y,t):y≥0, t≥0, x2≤yt}. For y>0 this is the inequality t≥x2/y; when y=0 it forces x=0 and t≥0; for y<0 it is empty. Thus E is closed, being defined by continuous non-strict inequalities. It is convex: if ∣xj∣≤yjtj for j=1,2, then for 0≤θ≤1, ∣θx1+(1−θ)x2∣≤θy1t1+(1−θ)y2t2≤(θy1+(1−θ)y2)(θt1+(1−θ)t2) by Cauchy–Schwarz. Therefore ϕ is closed convex. The objective is continuous and has second derivative e−x>0 in x, so it is closed convex and proper as well.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

On its domain ϕ≥0. If y>0, ϕ(x,y)≤0 forces x=0; if y=0, finiteness already forces x=0. Hence the feasible set is {(0,y):y≥0} and f0=1 throughout it, so p∗=1 and the primal minimum is attained, for example at (0,0). No point has ϕ(x,y)<0, so Slater fails.

3.1F1F2step 2.1algebra

For λ≥0, every point in the Lagrangian domain has e−x+λϕ(x,y)≥0, so q(λ)≥0. At λ=0, taking x→+∞ gives q(0)=0. For λ>0, take (xk,yk)=(k,k3); then e−xk+λϕ(xk,yk)=e−k+λ/k→0, so again q(λ)=0. Therefore d∗=sup⁡λ≥0q(λ)=0 and the positive duality gap is p∗−d∗=1. This does not contradict [F2], because its Slater hypothesis fails.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

The calculation gives a closed convex primal problem with attained finite optimum and a strict gap; the missing strict-feasibility condition is exactly the boundary that blocks the Slater theorem's certificate.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources