How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conditioning independent variables leaves the marginal law
Example
For independent random elements X and Y in arbitrary measurable spaces and , the constant probability kernel is a conditional law of X given Y. No standard-Borel assumption or AC existence theorem is needed for this explicit construction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and conventions in the example.
A supplied probability kernel satisfies the RCD definition when all conditioning-event integrals agree. Regular conditional distribution.
The kernel requires probability sections and measurable evaluations. Measure kernel and probability kernel.
Independent random elements have the product of their marginal probabilities as joint law. Independent random elements have product joint law.
Verification
For each y the section is a probability measure; for each A the evaluation is constant and therefore measurable. For , independence through [F3] gives Every event in is of this form, because the inverse images of all measurable B already form a sigma-algebra. This proves [F1], while the first two observations prove [F2].
For a concrete calculation, put probability 1/6 at each point of and let X,Y be the two coordinates. Each pair has probability , so their marginal rectangle probabilities factor and the coordinates are independent. The kernel gives for every y. For its event integral is , equal to the mass of the two points . If either variable is deterministic the same formula applies, with a Dirac marginal where appropriate.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, fifth edition (standard reference, not scraped)
- Varadhan, Probability Theory, Chapter 4 (standard reference, not scraped)