How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The cosets of in meet in pairwise disjoint classes, and rational translates of a Vitali set count them
Example
Fix a Vitali set . The equivalence classes of meet in pairwise disjoint pieces, and the rational translates of count those classes exactly:
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Vitali set .
A Vitali set on meets each class of in exactly one point (Vitali set on ).
is countably infinite ( is countably infinite).
Verification
Two points lie in the same class exactly when they differ by a rational, and [F1] says that contributes one and only one representative to each such class. Thus the pieces are pairwise disjoint and each is hit once by .
If , let be the unique representative of its class. Then and, because , also ; so for some . Conversely every with and lies in .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Vitali set (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)