How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Counting measure is an outer measure for which every subset is measurable
Example
For every set , counting measure is an outer measure on and every subset of is Carathéodory measurable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A set and its counting set function .
For every set , counting measure is a measure on . (Counting measure is a measure)
A set is Carathéodory measurable for when for every . (Carathéodory measurable sets)
Verification
The measure axioms in [L1] give normalization and countable additivity on the full power set, hence monotonicity and countable subadditivity; thus counting measure is an outer measure.
For arbitrary , the decomposition and countable additivity in [L1] give , so [F1] holds for every , including finite, infinite, and empty cases.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- G. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Section 1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)