How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rescaling can change covariance-PCA directions
Example
Let be uniform on and set . Then The leading correlation-PCA line is , while this line is not an eigenline of the covariance matrix. The two PCA conventions therefore give different leading directions for the same data after standardization.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A four-point probability space with probability at each point, , , and .
Covariance matrix of a finite-dimensional random vector: covariance entries are expectations of centered coordinate products.
Covariance and correlation principal component analysis: correlation-PCA divides centered coordinates by their positive standard deviations.
The leading PCA eigenspace maximizes projected variance: the leading eigenspace is the maximizing line for projected variance.
Verification
On this four-point space, , , and because two points have and two have . Thus , , , and . This gives the stated covariance matrix.
The positive standard-deviation matrix is , so [F2] gives . This matrix sends to and to ; hence its leading line is .
The covariance matrix has characteristic roots , so its leading eigenspace is a line. It sends to , which is not a scalar multiple of . Thus the correlation-PCA leading line is not the covariance-PCA leading line, and [F3] identifies each as the maximizing line for its own projected variance.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Online Bayesian Data Analysis, Lecture Notes 8: Learning Signal Representations (11 April 2016) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Soumendu Sundar Mukherjee, Multivariate Analysis, Lecture 8: Principal Component Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)