How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Decomposition inertia in a quadratic field
Example
In a quadratic Galois extension of number fields, let . For any nonzero base prime the three possibilities are: split: , , Frobenius identity; inert: , , , Frobenius the nonidentity element; ramified: , , arithmetic Frobenius coset identity in D/I.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data and hypotheses of the statement.
Galois prime decomposition efg: For a finite Galois extension L/K and nonzero prime p, every P above p has the same ramification index e and residue degree f. If there are g such primes, then .
Orders of decomposition and inertia groups: For finite Galois L/K and nonzero , writing e and f for its ramification index and residue degree, The prime P is unramified over p if and only if its inertia group is trivial.
Frobenius order is residue degree: For finite Galois L/K and nonzero , the arithmetic Frobenius coset has order in D/I. If P is unramified, has the same order in D.
Verification
Positive integers e,f,g with efg=2 have exactly the three displayed triples: the single factor 2 occurs in exactly one coordinate. These correspond respectively to split, inert, and ramified ideal factorizations.
The formulas and determine the subgroups, since has only its identity subgroup and itself. For e=1 the Frobenius order is f, giving identity in the split case and the unique element of order two in the inert case. In the ramified case D/I has order f=1, so the residue coset is identity; there is no assertion of a unique lift.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- §9.2.1 and §9.3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)