How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Degree-one Kostant classes correspond to simple reflections
Example
In the setting of Kostant's nilradical cohomology theorem, one line for each simple reflection , generated by the classes of the extremal cochains of The extremal weight cochain of a Weyl element is closed and unique. This identifies the common simple-reflection indexing of degree-one Kostant cohomology and the first term of the BGG resolution, without identifying the cohomology lines with the Verma modules, and shows that distinct simple roots give distinct weights, because is regular.
Verification
Given: The setting of Kostant's nilradical cohomology theorem, with simple reflections attached to a base of .
[L1] as -modules, and consequently (Kostant's nilradical cohomology theorem).
[L2] An element of has length exactly when it is a simple reflection: the length is the minimum number of simple reflections in an expression, so means for some , and conversely each has with inversion set (Length and longest Weyl-group element, Finite Weyl positive roots and simple reflections, Simple roots form a signed integral basis, Root reflections and the Weyl group action).
[L3] The classes of the extremal cochains are nonzero and the cochain space in the extremal weight is one-dimensional: and (The extremal weight cochain of a Weyl element is closed and unique).
[L4] Distinct simple roots give distinct reflections and distinct dot weights: for , and has trivial stabilizer, so forces (Positive coroot pairings of a dominant integral weight, Integral, dominant, and strictly dominant weights).
[L5] The degree-one term of the BGG complex is (The Bruhat graph and the BGG Verma sum in degree k, The classical BGG category O).
By [L1] and [L2], , and each summand is generated by the class of by [L3].
By [L4] the weights are pairwise distinct, so the displayed sum is direct with one line per simple reflection; and by [L5] the same index set labels the first BGG term, giving against as -module statements.
Depends on
- Kostant's nilradical cohomology theorem
- The extremal weight cochain of a Weyl element is closed and unique
- Length and longest Weyl-group element
- Finite Weyl positive roots and simple reflections
- Simple roots form a signed integral basis
- Root reflections and the Weyl group action
- Positive coroot pairings of a dominant integral weight
- Integral, dominant, and strictly dominant weights
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Bruhat graph and the BGG Verma sum in degree k
- The classical BGG category O
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Faisal Al-Faisal, On the Representation Theory of Semisimple Lie Groups (University of Waterloo MMath thesis, 2010), §3.4 printed pp.73–77 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peter Woit, Lie Algebra Cohomology and the Borel–Weil–Bott Theorem (Math G4344, Spring 2012), printed pp.1–7 (standard reference, not scraped)