How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A compact scale hyperprior removes the tail term and permits an explicit bandwidth balance
Example
Take to be uniform on , and suppose satisfies the hypotheses of Dirichlet normal-mixture posterior contraction. Let For , use and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , , and a truth satisfying the main theorem hypotheses.
Dirichlet normal-mixture posterior contraction: when is compactly supported in , the middle tail term is absent and the rate is .
Verification
For large , because and . Thus and . The compactly supported satisfies the lower scale-tail bound since for , and the upper tail is zero for .
Direct calculation gives and . Hence [F1] yields this Hellinger contraction upper bound in -probability. It is not a minimax claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Subhashis Ghosal and Aad W. van der Vaart, Posterior convergence rates of Dirichlet mixtures at smooth densities, Theorem 1 (standard reference, not scraped)