How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The dyadic simple approximants for on at and
Example
For on , the explicit dyadic truncations are:
and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The nonnegative measurable function on and the explicit dyadic truncations from the simple-approximation theorem.
For a nonnegative measurable function, the approximants are
Verification
For , the two dyadic cells are [L1, algebra] and , while the truncation cell is . On these become exactly the three intervals displayed in the first formula.
For , the eight nontrivial dyadic cells are [step 1.1, L1, algebra] for , together with the truncation cell . On these become , , , , , , , , and , exactly as displayed.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sheldon Axler, Measure, Integration and Real Analysis, Theorem 2.89 (standard reference, not scraped)