How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The singleton set and trivial group are terminal, while the empty set and trivial group are initial
Example
In the empty-diagram limit is any singleton and its colimit is . In both are the trivial group.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The empty diagrams in and .
Empty-diagram limits are terminal objects and empty-diagram colimits are initial objects (Limits of empty diagrams are terminal objects, and colimits of empty diagrams are initial objects).
Sets and functions form (Sets and functions form the large locally small category ).
Groups and homomorphisms form (Groups and group homomorphisms form the large locally small category ).
Verification
For every set , exactly one function and exactly one function exist. Thus the singleton is terminal and the empty set initial in .
For every group , the constant map is the unique homomorphism to the trivial group. A homomorphism must send the identity to the identity, so it too is unique. Thus is both terminal and initial in .
Applying [L1] to steps 1.1 and 1.2 gives the four claimed empty-diagram limits and colimits.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 31 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Example 3.1.14 (standard reference, not scraped)