How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A quadratic mirror map gives a projected gradient step
Example
Let , let be nonempty, bounded, closed, and convex with nonempty interior, choose , and set on . Initialize at a minimizer of on . At any round with current decision and gradient , the agile mirror step with parameter has and
Thus its one-step update map is exactly the projected gradient update with the same step size. If is set to the current projected-gradient step size, the two displayed one-step maps agree.
Example references
Agile online mirror descent: defines the agile dual step and Bregman projection.
Compactness makes the Bregman projection well-defined: establishes existence and uniqueness of the minimizer over .
Mirror maps, Bregman divergence, and local Hessian norms: defines the quadratic regularizer's Bregman divergence and Hessian norms.
Projected online gradient descent: defines the projected gradient update with the current step size.
The Euclidean inner product on : defines the Euclidean norm and inner product used in the quadratic.
A convex subset of contains every line segment between two of its points: supplies the segment condition for the decision set.
The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement: closedness is in the Euclidean metric topology.
Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space: boundedness is with respect to the Euclidean metric.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The quadratic regularizer, current decision, gradient, positive step size, and closed bounded convex set in the Example.
Agile online mirror descent: the dual update satisfies and the next decision minimizes on .
Projected online gradient descent: the projected gradient step is , where is the unique nearest point of to .
Compactness makes the Bregman projection well-defined: the Bregman projection minimizer is unique for a strongly convex regularizer on compact .
Verification
Differentiating gives and , so the regularizer is -strongly convex and its Hessian is positive definite everywhere.
The dual equation [F2] becomes , hence .
For , substitution into [F1] gives : expanding cancels the cross terms and leaves this squared distance.
By step 2.1, minimizing over is the same as minimizing Euclidean distance to ; [F4] gives a unique minimizer, which is . Substitution of step 1.2 yields , the projected-gradient update in [F3] when .
Depends on
- Agile online mirror descent
- Compactness makes the Bregman projection well-defined
- Mirror maps, Bregman divergence, and local Hessian norms
- Projected online gradient descent
- The Euclidean inner product $\langle x,y\rangle = \sum_{k<n} x_k y_k$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$
- A convex subset of $\mathbb{R}^m$ contains every line segment between two of its points
- The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement
- Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Elad Hazan, Introduction to Online Convex Optimization, second edition (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peter Bartlett, Stat 260/CS 294-102: Learning in Sequential Decision Problems, mirror-descent lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)