Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Evaluation functionals and point masses

Example

Let K be a nonempty compact Hausdorff space and tK. On C(K;C) with supremum norm, δt(f)=f(t) has norm one and is represented by the regular point mass at t. If ϕ:KK is a homeomorphism and Pf=fϕ, then Pδt=δϕ(t).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The spaces, maps, scalar field, and hypotheses in the statement above. All duals consist of linear functionals over the ambient field; evaluation has no conjugation.

[F1]

From The transpose of a bounded operator, with its stated hypotheses: Let K=R or C. Let T:XY be bounded and linear between normed spaces. Its transpose, or Banach adjoint, is T:YX,(Tg)(x)=g(Tx). The duals are def-dual-space-of-a-normed-space. Composition is bounded by lem-composition-operator-norm-inequality, so this has the displayed codomain. It is linear in g over K. No complex conjugation is inserted; a Hilbert adjoint uses a separate inner-product identification.

[F2]

From The bounded complex dual of C_0(X) is regular complex measures, with its stated hypotheses: For an LCH space X, every bounded complex linear functional L on C0(X;C) has a unique representation L(f)=Xfdμ by a finite regular complex Borel measure μ. Conversely each such μ defines a bounded functional and L=μ(X).

Verification

1.1

Evaluation is complex-linear and f(t)f. The continuous constant function 1 has norm one since K, and δt(1)=1, so δt=1.

given
1.2

Define the Borel measure μt(A)=1 when tA and 0 otherwise. In a disjoint countable union at most one member contains t, proving countable additivity. Its mass is one. For inner regularity, a set containing t contains the compact singleton {t}, and a set not containing t has measure zero. For outer regularity, a set missing t lies in the open set K{t} of measure zero; for a set containing t, every open superset has measure one.

given
2.1

Integration of a simple Borel function against μt equals its value at t. Uniform simple approximation of a bounded complex Borel function extends this identity, since the integral error is bounded by the uniform error times μt(K)=1. In particular fdμt=f(t) for fC(K;C). Compact Hausdorff K is LCH and C0(K)=C(K), so RMK uniqueness identifies this regular point mass as the representing measure.

F2step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

Composition with a homeomorphism preserves continuity and the supremum norm. For every f, (Pδt)(f)=δt(fϕ)=f(ϕ(t))=δϕ(t)(f), which proves the transpose identity.

F1step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources