Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exponential event-time observations with censoring and delayed entry

Example

Let T have exponential density fλ(t)=λe−λt on [0,∞), where λ>0. Use fixed administrative censoring times where specified, and use delayed entry at L=1 only for subjects selected by T>1. Compute the event-model factors for right-censoring, interval observation, current status, delayed entry, and right truncation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exponential event-time density above; the observation conventions in Event-time observation, censoring, and truncation schemes; and the conditional likelihood formulas in Likelihood contributions under censoring, truncation, and delayed entry.

[F1]

Right censoring records U=min⁡(T,C) and δ=1{T≤C}; interval observation records L<T≤R; current status records 1{T≤C}; delayed entry selects T>L. Event-time observation, censoring, and truncation schemes

[F2]

Under the stated continuous event law, the right-censored event term is fλ(U)δSλ(U)1−δ; the interval term is Fλ(R)−Fλ(L); the current-status term is Fλ(C)δSλ(C)1−δ; delayed entry divides the event term by Sλ(L). Likelihood contributions under censoring, truncation, and delayed entry

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

Integrating the density gives Fλ(t)=1−e−λt and Sλ(t)=e−λt for t≥0; in particular Fλ(0)=0 and Sλ(0)=1.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

With fixed censoring time C=2, an event observed at U=1 has event factor fλ(1)=λe−λ and censor factor 1. A censored observation at U=2 has event factor Sλ(2)=e−2λ and censor factor 1 relative to the point-mass censoring law.

2.2F2step 1.1algebra

An interval observation 1<T≤2 has probability Fλ(2)−Fλ(1)=(1−e−2λ)−(1−e−λ)=e−λ−e−2λ.

2.3F2step 1.1algebra

At fixed inspection time C=1, current status δ=1 has event factor Fλ(1)=1−e−λ, and δ=0 has event factor Sλ(1)=e−λ.

2.4F2step 1.1algebra

After delayed entry L=1, with fixed censoring time C=3, an event observed at U=2 has conditional event factor fλ(2)/Sλ(1)=λe−2λ/e−λ=λe−λ. A censored observation at U=3 has conditional event factor Sλ(3)/Sλ(1)=e−2λ.

2.5F2step 1.1algebra

If instead the sample is right-truncated at R=2, the selected-sample density is λe−λt/(1−e−2λ) for 0≤t<2, since P(T<2)=Fλ(2)=1−e−2λ. This is a conditional event-time density, not a right-censoring contribution.

3.1step 2.1step 2.4step 2.5∎

The censoring and truncation examples use different event factors: ordinary right censoring uses fλ(u) or Sλ(u), delayed entry divides by Sλ(1), and right truncation divides by P(T<2).

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources