How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A two-node semilinear diffusion FAS cycle has an explicit local rate
Statement
On with homogeneous endpoint values, the centered finite-difference discretization of the semilinear equation has fine residual Use , , , the Galerkin coarse residual , one pre- and one post-sweep , and the exact selected coarse root. The unique fine root is . The actual exact-branch FAS two-grid map is a contraction toward on with error factor at most .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite-difference model, transfer maps, Galerkin coarse operator, exact coarse branch, one pre/post update , and exact real arithmetic specified in the Statement. Matrix and linear-map operator norms are induced by the Euclidean norm; for a bilinear map , .
Finite-budget nonlinear FAS two-grid cycle: the coarse target is and the corrected state is .
Derivative of the exact-branch FAS two-grid cycle: with invertible coarse Jacobian, the derivative of the actual two-grid map is the composition of the pre-smoother derivative, , and the post-smoother derivative.
A smooth FAS cycle converges locally under its actual derivative bounds: if the actual cycle fixes the root, , and is -Lipschitz on a radius- convex ball with , then the cycle maps the ball into itself and contracts errors toward that root by .
On a convex open set, a uniform bound implies : on a convex open Euclidean set, a uniform bound on the total derivative of a map implies the corresponding Lipschitz bound between points of that set.
Second derivative formula for a composed cycle map: if , , and , then .
Example
Given: The mesh nodes , endpoint values , the fine operator and transfers in the Statement, and exact coarse root selection.
Verification
The continuous model is on with zero endpoint values, and this proof concerns the specified finite-difference residual. The vectors and are eigenvectors of with eigenvalues and , so . For real , , since . Therefore, for , . Since , any other root would give , so is the unique root. Direct differentiation gives .
Direct multiplication gives , , and hence Writing , [F1] gives the coarse target The scalar map has and limits at , so for every it has one exact root. An exact direct solver is because ; thus . The displayed formula is a composition of smooth real functions, so the selected branch, correction map , and cycle map are on an open neighborhood of the ball. At the branch has and .
The pre/post map has derivative at zero The coarse-branch equation has right side , a cubic with . Differentiating at zero gives . The derivative of the coarse correction is the orthogonal projection onto . The symmetric vector is an eigenvector of with eigenvalue , and has eigenvalue . Thus for , [F2] gives
It remains to bound the derivative variation. Set and . On , The first inequality is Cauchy--Schwarz. The second follows from and . Differentiating gives and , which give the last two bounds. If , then , , and twice differentiating yields Writing , it follows that and on this ball.
Since , for in the radius- ball. Orthogonality of and gives . On the radius- ball, and ; on the radius- ball, . The formula [F5] for therefore gives For each unit , apply [F4] on the open radius- ball to the map ; the Hessian bound gives derivative norm less than . By continuity the resulting Lipschitz bound extends to the closed ball, so there.
The pre/post map fixes zero because . At , [F1] gives restricted value and coarse target ; by step 1.2, the exact selected coarse root is , so the correction is zero and . By steps 1.3 and 2.1, , , and , hence Applying [F3] proves invariance of the ball and the stated local error rate. This single fixed mesh example makes no mesh-independent claim.
Remarks
The diffusion matrix is the standard second-difference Dirichlet matrix for on the four nodes, and the cubic is a monotone semilinear reaction. The monotonicity and all FAS convergence hypotheses used here are checked directly in finite dimensions; no parabolic compactness, finite-element projector stability, or continuum convergence theorem is imported.
Depends on
- Finite-budget nonlinear FAS two-grid cycle
- An exact fine root is fixed by the FAS V/W cycle
- Derivative of the exact-branch FAS two-grid cycle
- Second derivative formula for a composed cycle map
- A smooth FAS cycle converges locally under its actual derivative bounds
- On a convex open set, a uniform bound $\|Df(z)v\|_2\le M\|v\|_2$ implies $\|f(y)-f(x)\|_2\le M\|y-x\|_2$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- William L. Briggs, Van Emden Henson, and Steve F. McCormick, A Multigrid Tutorial, 2nd ed., Chapter 6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Harald van Brummelen, Basics of Multigrid Methods, SINTEF winter-school lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Van Emden Henson, Multigrid Methods for Nonlinear Problems: An Overview, UCRL-JC-150259 (standard reference, not scraped)