Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A finite deterministic copy has mutual information equal to entropy

Statement

Assume AC for the measurable-space KL interface. Let X be Bernoulli with P(X=1)=p and P(X=0)=1−p, and set Y=X. Then I(X;Y)=H(X)=−pln⁡p−(1−p)ln⁡(1−p), where H(X) means the finite Shannon entropy of the probability vector of X and 0ln⁡0=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, p∈[0,1], and the finite-valued random variables X and Y.

[A1]

AC is needed by the general measurable-space KL definition through its Radon–Nikodym density. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

Mutual information is KL of the joint law against the product of its marginals. Measure-theoretic mutual information

[F2]

The finite MI convention is the joint KL against the product of the marginal pmfs, and the measurable-space KL equals this finite sum on a finite alphabet. Finite mutual information Finite KL divergence agrees with measurable-space KL Information units and logarithm-base convention

[F3]

Finite Shannon entropy is −∑ipiln⁡pi with 0ln⁡0=0. Finite distributions, entropy, divergence, and stochastic matrices

[F4]

A finite set with the discrete metric is complete and separable, hence Polish; its Borel sigma-algebra is discrete and therefore standard Borel. Polish spaces are separable completely metrizable spaces Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset Standard Borel spaces

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2F3F4given

On {0,1}, define d(x,y)=0 if x=y and d(x,y)=1 otherwise; distinct endpoints force at least one of the two intermediate distances to be 1, so the triangle inequality holds. For a Cauchy sequence, tolerance 1/2 forces all sufficiently late terms to be equal, so the metric is complete. The finite set itself is a finite dense subset, and radius-1/2 balls are singletons, so the topology is discrete. By the definitions in [F4], this is a Polish presentation of the discrete sigma-algebra, which is therefore standard Borel. If p=0 or p=1, X and Y are the same constant almost surely; their joint law and the product of their marginals are the same point mass. Thus [F1] gives a finite-alphabet mutual information, [F2] gives I(X;Y)=0, and [F3] gives the same entropy.

2.1A1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Suppose 0<p<1. The joint law of (X,Y) has masses p at (1,1) and 1−p at (0,0), and zero elsewhere. The product law has masses p2 at (1,1) and (1−p)2 at (0,0). By [F1]–[F2], I(X;Y)=pln⁡pp2+(1−p)ln⁡1−p(1−p)2=−pln⁡p−(1−p)ln⁡(1−p). The last quantity is H(X) by [F3].

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

The endpoint cases in step 1.1 and the interior case in step 2.1 exhaust p∈[0,1] and establish the claimed identity throughout.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources