Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

First nontrivial Postnikov stage of a simply connected space

Claim

Let X be a simply connected CW complex, and let n2 be least such that πn(X)0. Then

PnXK(πnX,n).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A Postnikov section XPnX is an isomorphism on πi for in and has πi(PnX)=0 for i>n (Postnikov towers exist for connected CW complexes).

Verification

Given: X and the least index n in the claim.

1.1

Simple connectedness gives π1(X)=0, and minimality gives πi(X)=0 for 1<i<n. By [F1], the same is true for PnX, while πn(PnX)πn(X) and every group above n vanishes.

F1
2.1

The surviving group is abelian by [F2]. Since the Postnikov construction supplies a connected CW model, Step 1.1 is exactly the defining homotopy-group condition for K(πnX,n). The hypothesis that a least nonzero group exists excludes the weakly contractible case.

F2step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources