How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A tied observation keeps fractional Gaussian responsibilities
Example
Assume AC. Take one observation , two Gaussian components with means and , common variance , and mixture weights and . Their component density is , and the responsibility of component is . The two squared distances from the observation to the component means are both . For every , the responsibility vector is exactly ; therefore as it remains fractional rather than converging to or .
Example references
Finite Gaussian mixture with positive-definite component covariances — the positive-weight Gaussian component formula and responsibility definition.
Equal-spherical mixture assignments and objective converge to k-means — tied nearest centers receive limiting responsibilities proportional to their fixed mixture weights.
Positive-definite multivariate Gaussian density is normalized — each component formula is a normalized Gaussian density.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume AC; take one observation at , means and , common variance , and positive weights .
The Axiom of Choice: AC is the stated assumption of the finite-Gaussian definition and the local component-density normalization theorem.
Finite Gaussian mixture with positive-definite component covariances: in one dimension, , and the responsibility is the weighted component density divided by their sum.
Positive-definite multivariate Gaussian density is normalized: for positive variance, this component formula is finite and strictly positive and integrates to one.
Equal-spherical mixture assignments and objective converge to k-means: at a tied nearest-center set, fixed positive weights yield limiting responsibilities equal to those weights renormalized over the tied set.
Proof
Substitution in [F1] gives By [F2], is finite and positive under [A1].
The responsibility denominator is . Dividing the two weighted component values by that denominator gives and for every .
Since the vector is constant for all positive , its limit as is , which is not one-hot. Both centers are nearest to , so [F3] gives the same tied-center limit, proportional to the fixed weights.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Christopher M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, §9.3.2 and Exercise 9.11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Hastie, Tibshirani, and Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd ed., corrected 12th printing, Exercise 13.1 (standard reference, not scraped)