How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Godunov finite volumes preserve the Burgers shock speed
Example
For , use the Godunov flux of Godunov numerical flux for Burgers' equation on cells of width with . Let for and for , with cell-average initialization. The scheme preserves the stationary shock exactly: Its reconstruction is the same stationary weak shock for every . The Rankine–Hugoniot speed is , which is the speed of this limit.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Burgers' flux , the Godunov scheme with , and the Riemann data to the left of zero and to its right.
The scheme starts from cell averages and updates each cell by the right-minus-left shared flux difference. (Conservative two-point finite-volume schemes for scalar laws)
The state reconstruction is constant with value on . (Piecewise-constant finite-volume state and face-flux reconstructions)
, and is continuous and consistent with . (Godunov numerical flux for Burgers' equation, The Burgers Godunov flux is continuous and consistent)
A measurable, locally essentially bounded state satisfying the weak identity with the initial boundary term is a locally bounded distributional weak solution. (Locally bounded distributional weak solutions of scalar laws)
A one-dimensional shock with distinct traces has speed . (The Rankine--Hugoniot jump condition in space--time normal form)
Verification
The cell averages are for and for . The only face pairs are , , and ; [F3] gives flux in all three cases.
Every cell therefore has equal left and right fluxes at every step, so the update leaves every unchanged. Induction on gives exactly the stationary step profile displayed in the Example.
By [F2] and step 2.1, every reconstruction equals for and for almost everywhere, so strongly in and . For any , compact support makes vanish near , and for ; hence . Also almost everywhere, so . Thus the weak identity holds, and [F4] gives the claimed local weak solution without an additional choice axiom.
The traces are and . Thus [F5] gives , agreeing with the stationary interface.
Depends on
- Conservative two-point finite-volume schemes for scalar laws
- Piecewise-constant finite-volume state and face-flux reconstructions
- Godunov numerical flux for Burgers' equation
- The Burgers Godunov flux is continuous and consistent
- Locally bounded distributional weak solutions of scalar laws
- The Rankine--Hugoniot jump condition in space--time normal form
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- H. De Sterck and P. Ullrich, Introduction to Computational PDEs, Chapter 3, complete chapter, PDF pp. 81–106 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Benjamin Seibold, MIT OpenCourseWare 18.336, Lecture 19: Finite Volume Methods, complete six-page note (standard reference, not scraped)