How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Hausdorff–Young exponent arithmetic
Example
For any sigma-finite-space complex-linear core operator with bounds of constant A and of constant B, the value gives target exponent 4 and bound . The endpoint targets at p=1 and p=2 are respectively infinity and two.
Facts & Assumptions
The abstract endpoint bound uses theta=2-2/p and the target conjugate exponent Interpolate L1 to Linfinity and L2 to L2 bounds.
Verification
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
At , , , and , so . The bound in F1 becomes . For instance A=B=1 gives coefficient one.
At p=1 the reciprocal target exponent is , giving infinity and the hypothesis . At p=2 it is , giving two and . These direct endpoint statements remain meaningful for A=0 or B=0, while the interior square-root coefficient is zero if either vanishes. No Fourier operator or its endpoint bounds are being presumed.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Laugesen Remark C.7(1), p.169; explicit specialization (standard reference, not scraped)