How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Group and function Hopf algebras of the symmetric group on three letters
Example
Let , the six permutations of under composition, and let and , with the rightmost permutation applied first. Compare the group algebra and the function algebra for any field . The first is noncommutative and cocommutative; the second is commutative and noncocommutative. Both are Hopf algebras.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite group , a field , and the group-algebra and finite-function-algebra structures.
For any group the group algebra has ; for a finite group the function algebra has pointwise product and , with the finite-set tensor identification (Group algebras, finite-group function algebras, and polynomial Hopf algebras).
Verification
Applying the stated composition convention gives , since , , and ; it gives , since , , and . These are distinct permutations.
The group elements form a basis of , so the products of the basis vectors are the distinct basis vectors and from step 1.1; hence is not commutative. For every basis vector , , and linearity then gives cocommutativity on all of .
Multiplication in is pointwise, so at every group element and this algebra is commutative. Let , the function equal to at and elsewhere. Then , whereas by step 1.1. Therefore , so is not cocommutative.
The structures in [F1] make both algebras Hopf algebras, while steps 2.1–2.2 show that commutativity and cocommutativity distinguish the two examples exactly as stated.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hans-Jürgen Schneider, Lectures on Hopf algebras, notes by Sonia Natale (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof and Mykola Semenyakin, A brief introduction to quantum groups (standard reference, not scraped)