How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rank-one Hecke specializations can be semisimple or nonsemisimple
Example
Let with its one simple reflection, and use the local normalized Hecke parameter in Universal parameters, the generic Coxeter Hecke algebra and generator conjugacy. The base-change statement of The standard basis of the generic Hecke algebra and base change identifies each specialization with the quotient having one generator and relation . Here an algebra is called semisimple when its left regular module is a direct sum of simple left ideals; a simple module is a nonzero module with no proper nonzero submodule.
For , is the dual-number algebra , so it is not semisimple. For or , is , which is semisimple. Thus these small root-of-unity specializations already have different behavior; no generic quantum Schur–Weyl centralizer statement is being specialized here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rank-one Coxeter system , the universal Hecke algebra over its Laurent parameter ring, and the specializations , , and over .
Universal parameters, the generic Coxeter Hecke algebra and generator conjugacy: the rank-one quadratic relation is for a unit parameter .
The standard basis of the generic Hecke algebra and base change: arbitrary scalar extension presents the specialized Hecke algebra by the images of the same quadratic and braid relations, with no flatness assumption.
, so and is a unit in .
The values and are units in and each has square .
Verification
For any unit , expanding [F1] and putting gives , equivalently ; thus the multiplicative source parameter is , while all calculations below keep the local generator. Now set . Then [F1] gives , and [F2] identifies this as the complete specialized presentation. With , translation gives mutually inverse homomorphisms between and . Every class has a unique form : terms of degree at least two vanish, and a polynomial of degree at most one lying in has both coefficients zero. Hence the algebra has basis and is nonzero.
For and , [F1] gives the same relation , using [F2] for the specialization. The elements and are orthogonal idempotents with sum . The classes are linearly independent because no nonzero polynomial of degree at most one is divisible by , so and are nonzero and form a basis. Thus , and each one-dimensional left ideal is simple. The regular module is semisimple.
The left ideal is one-dimensional, nonzero and proper by step 1.1, so the left regular module is not simple. If it were a direct sum of simple left ideals, its dimension two would force it to be a sum of two one-dimensional simple modules. On any one-dimensional module, left multiplication by is a scalar satisfying , hence . It would then annihilate both summands and therefore all of , contradicting . Thus the regular module is not semisimple.
Steps 2.1 and 1.2 establish the two different specialization outcomes under the stated normalized relation. They make no claim about higher ranks, centralizers, positive characteristic, or every root of unity. No choice principle is used: every basis, idempotent, and module complement calculation is explicit and finite.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Meinolf Geck, Modular Representations of Hecke Algebras (standard reference, not scraped)