How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A tensor product Hopf algebra from a group and a primitive element
Example
Let be a group, let have its group-algebra Hopf structure, and let have primitive generator . The tensor product is a Hopf algebra. For and , Its counit is for and for . In particular is group-like, is primitive, and the two tensor factors commute inside .
Verification
Given: A group , a field , the group-algebra Hopf structure on , the primitive polynomial Hopf structure on , and the tensor-product Hopf construction proved on the A page.
[F1] Hopf quotients, kernels of Hopf maps, and tensor products: for Hopf algebras , the coproduct on is , the antipode is , and both antipode identities hold.
[F2] Group algebras, finite-group function algebras, and polynomial Hopf algebras: group algebras have group-like basis elements and antipode inversion, while has primitive generator and antipode .
Applying [F1] to these two Hopf algebras gives the tensor-product Hopf structure. The tensor algebra multiplication yields , and it also shows that commutes with .
Since and the two summands commute in , the binomial theorem gives . Combining this with and the flipped middle factors in [F1] gives the displayed formula for .
The tensor antipode in [F1] gives . Directly, for the left antipode product on a basis tensor, which is for and for . The right product is , with the same values. Thus the explicit formulas agree with both antipode equations from [F1].
By [F1], the tensor-product counit is . The group-algebra counit has , while the polynomial counit is a unital algebra map with by [F2], so it takes to and to for . Therefore for and for , as claimed.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kalle Kytölä, Introduction to Hopf algebras and representations, Exercise 28 (standard reference, not scraped)