Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A Hopf--Lax solution with a forming corner from smooth data

Example

Let H(p)=p2/2, L(v)=v2/2, and u0(x)=e−x2−1. Then u0 is smooth, bounded and uniformly continuous, with p0(y):=u0′(y)=−2ye−y2 and u0′′(y)=(4y2−2)e−y2. The characteristic projection is Xt(y)=y+tp0(y)=y−2tye−y2, and its lifted value is Zt(y)=u0(y)+t2p0(y)2. For 0≤t<12, Xt is a diffeomorphism of R, and ucl(Xt(y),t)=Zt(y) is the classical characteristic solution. At t=12, Xt′(0)=0; for t>12, putting st=log⁡(2t) gives Xt(−st)=Xt(0)=Xt(st)=0, so the characteristic projection is no longer injective and its single-valued classical graph breaks down. The Hopf--Lax formula u(x,t)=inf⁡y∈R{e−y2−1+∣x−y∣22t},t>0, is finite, satisfies −1≤u(x,t)≤0, is uniformly continuous in x, and is a viscosity solution of ut+12ux2=0 with initial datum u0 (The Hopf--Lax formula solves the Hamilton--Jacobi Cauchy problem, The Hopf--Lax operator preserves a modulus of continuity). For each fixed t>12, the minimisers at x=0 are exactly y=±st, and u(0,t)=1+log⁡(2t)2t−1. For x>0 sufficiently close to 0, the unique minimiser tends to st as x↓0; for x<0 sufficiently close to 0, it tends to −st as x↑0. Thus the one-sided spatial derivatives tend to −st/t from the right and st/t from the left, so u(⋅,t) is continuous but has a corner at x=0.

Verification

Given: The Hamiltonian H(p)=p2/2 with Lagrangian L(v)=v2/2, the datum u0(y)=e−y2−1, its derivatives p0=u0′, u0′′, the characteristic data Xt(y)=y+tp0(y), Zt(y)=u0(y)+t2p0(y)2, and the Hopf--Lax function u=Qtu0 (The Hopf--Lax operator and the Hopf--Lax formula, Characteristic crossing and caustic for a first-order PDE).

[F1] Qtu0 satisfies the bounds −1≤Qtu0≤0, is spatially uniformly continuous, and is a viscosity solution with datum u0 (The Hopf--Lax operator preserves a modulus of continuity, The Hopf--Lax formula solves the Hamilton--Jacobi Cauchy problem); the defining infimum is attained (Finiteness, superlinearity of the Lagrangian and localisation of Hopf--Lax near-minimisers).

[F2] Differentiation rules for the elementary functions give p0(y)=−2ye−y2, p0′(y)=(4y2−2)e−y2, and Xt′(y)=1+tp0′(y)=1−2te−y2+4ty2e−y2 (The total (Fréchet) derivative Df(a) as the linear first-order approximation with o(∥h∥2) remainder, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn).

Proof technique: explicit characteristic and minimiser computations.

1.1F2F3algebra

Classical solution before the first singular time. For 0≤t<1/2, [F2] gives Xt′(y)≥1−2t>0. The mean value theorem [F3] makes Xt strictly increasing, and Xt(y)−y=−2tye−y2→0 at both infinities, so the intermediate value theorem gives a unique inverse Y(x,t). This inverse is continuous jointly: near any fixed (x,t), Xt′ has a positive lower bound, and the mean value theorem bounds changes in Y by changes in x and in Xt(Y). Differentiating the identity x=Y+tp0(Y) by difference quotients then gives Yx=(1+tp0′(Y))−1 and Yt=−p0(Y)/(1+tp0′(Y)), continuously. Thus ucl(x,t)=u0(Y)+(t/2)p0(Y)2 is C1, with ucl,x=p0(Y) and ucl,t=−p0(Y)2/2, by substitution of these derivatives. It solves the equation and has the initial datum u0.

1.2F2algebra

Breakdown of the projection. At t=12 we have Xt′(0)=1−2t=0. For t>12 put st=log⁡(2t)>0; then e−st2=1/(2t), so Xt(±st)=±st−2t(±st)/(2t)=0=Xt(0), and the projection is not injective; it is locally decreasing near y=0 because Xt′(0)=1−2t<0. The loss of rank at t=1/2, y=0, is the caustic of Characteristic crossing and caustic for a first-order PDE; the later equal projections show global folding, without asserting local noninjectivity at y=0 for t>1/2.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F1F2F3algebra∎

Bounds, minimisers at x=0, and the corner. By [F1] the Hopf--Lax function is finite, −1≤u≤0 and uniformly continuous in x. For gt(y):=e−y2−1+y2/(2t) we have gt′(y)=y(1/t−2e−y2), so for t>12 the critical points are 0,±st, with gt′′(0)=1/t−2<0 and gt′′(±st)=2st2/t>0; since gt(y)→∞ as ∣y∣→∞ and gt(±st)=−1+(1+log⁡(2t))/(2t)<0=gt(0) (since gt′(y)<0 for 0<y<st and [F3] makes gt strictly decreasing there), the global minimisers of gt are exactly ±st, and the value is (1+log⁡(2t))/(2t)−1. For Gt(x,y):=u0(y)+(x−y)2/(2t) any minimiser obeys ∣x−y∣≤2t, so all minimisers for ∣x∣≤1 lie in a fixed compact interval. For every neighbourhood of {−st,st}, the complement in this interval has a positive gap above min⁡gt by continuity and compact attainment [F1]; uniform convergence Gt(x,⋅)→gt on the interval forces every minimiser into that neighbourhood for all sufficiently small ∣x∣. since Gt(x,y)−Gt(x,−y)=−2xy/t, a minimiser cannot be negative when x>0 nor positive when x<0, and y=0 is not a minimiser for x≠0 because ∂yGt(x,0)=−x/t≠0. Hence all minimisers have the sign of x and, as x↓0, they converge to st (and to −st as x↑0). The stationarity equation is x=Ft(y):=y−2tye−y2 with Ft′(±st)=2st2>0, so on small intervals around ±st, Ft′ is bounded below by a positive constant. The mean value and intermediate value theorems [F3] give a unique local inverse there, and its difference quotient has derivative 1/Ft′(y), which is continuous. Since every minimiser is on the corresponding interval for small ∣x∣, this inverse is the unique C1 minimising branch on each punctured side. Along a branch the envelope derivative is ux=(x−y(x))/t, whose one-sided limits are −st/t (from the right) and st/t (from the left); these unequal finite limits show that u(⋅,t) has a corner at x=0 while remaining continuous.

Remarks

  • What is claimed. The computation identifies the minimisers and the one-sided derivatives at the corner; it does not assert local noninjectivity of Xt near y=0, where Xt′(0)<0 and the map is locally decreasing, and it does not claim that the classical solution extends past t=12.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

70 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources