How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
IID functional data in the block bootstrap regime
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. In , let be the constant function and let , where the innovations are independent with . This IID functional series satisfies the moving and tapered block bootstrap theorems with and, in tapered mode, the window .
Verification
Given: AC and the IID signs, constant function, block lengths and window in the Example.
[F1] L2-m-approximable causal Bernoulli shifts retains the most recent innovations when forming .
[F2] Moving block bootstrap CLT for dependent Hilbert-valued data and Tapered block bootstrap CLT for dependent Hilbert-valued data give conditional Gaussian mean limits and Hilbert–Schmidt covariance consistency under their stated process, block and taper conditions, assuming The Axiom of Choice.
The filter is measurable: it is the coordinate projection followed by a map from the finite innovation space to . We have and . For every , the retained current innovation gives exactly, so . Thus both and hold. Independence and identical laws follow directly because each depends only on its own IID innovation.
The integer lengths satisfy , and . The window vanishes off , takes values in , is positive near , symmetric, and nondecreasing on . Every midpoint weight equals one, so and . All assumptions of both theorems are therefore met, giving their stated conditional law and covariance limits for this IID example.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.