Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Independent non-identical finite sources can have no information-rate limit

Example

Let N0=0 and Nk=2k2 for k≥1. For Nk−1<i≤Nk, let pi be the fair Bernoulli law when k is even, and the point mass at 0 when k is odd. For each n, let Pn(xn)=∏i=1npi(xi) be the resulting finite product law on {0,1}n, and on its support put In(xn)=−n−1ln⁡Pn(xn). These block laws are consistent under coordinate projection. The coordinates are independent within each block law, but their marginals are not identical. The normalized information densities have no limit in probability to a constant, where this means that Pn(∣In−c∣>ε)↛0 for some ε>0 and every constant c: at even block endpoints they tend to ln⁡2, and at odd endpoints they tend to 0. This example uses only finite product laws; no infinite-product extension is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The endpoint sequence and finite product laws in the Example.

[F1]

Self-information and surprisal variance for a finite law: For a finite law q, its self-information on the support is −ln⁡q(x).

[F2]

Finite-alphabet IID information AEP with a variance bound: The AEP conclusion is for an identically distributed independent sequence.

Verification

Given: The block laws Pn in the Example.

1.1givenalgebraconstruct

Each pi is a probability law on {0,1}. The finite product Pn(xn)=∏i=1npi(xi) is nonnegative and sums to ∏i=1n∑xi∈{0,1}pi(xi)=1, so it is a well-defined finite law. Summing over the last coordinate gives Pn−1, proving consistency.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Let Fn be the number of fair coordinates among 1,…,n. At every positive-probability word, each fair coordinate contributes ln⁡2 to −ln⁡Pn(xn) and every point-mass coordinate contributes 0. Hence In(xn):=−n−1ln⁡Pn(xn)=Fnln⁡2/n on the entire support, so its law under Pn is a point mass at this value.

3.1step 2.1algebra

If k is even, the newest block is fair and Nk−Nk−1≤FNk≤Nk; since Nk−1/Nk=2−2k+1→0, FNk/Nk→1. If k is odd, the newest block is deterministic and 0≤FNk≤Nk−1, so FNk/Nk→0.

4.1F2step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

By step 2.1, INk is deterministic under PNk. Step 3.1 gives subsequential limits ln⁡2 and 0. For any constant c, at least one of ∣c∣ and ∣c−ln⁡2∣ is at least ln⁡2/2; along that subsequence, for ε=ln⁡2/3, the probability of ∣INk−c∣>ε is eventually 1. Thus there is no limit in probability to a constant. The coordinate laws alternate, so the IID hypotheses of [F2] are absent.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources