How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Independent non-identical finite sources can have no information-rate limit
Example
Let and for . For , let be the fair Bernoulli law when is even, and the point mass at when is odd. For each , let be the resulting finite product law on , and on its support put . These block laws are consistent under coordinate projection. The coordinates are independent within each block law, but their marginals are not identical. The normalized information densities have no limit in probability to a constant, where this means that for some and every constant : at even block endpoints they tend to , and at odd endpoints they tend to . This example uses only finite product laws; no infinite-product extension is assumed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The endpoint sequence and finite product laws in the Example.
Self-information and surprisal variance for a finite law: For a finite law , its self-information on the support is .
Finite-alphabet IID information AEP with a variance bound: The AEP conclusion is for an identically distributed independent sequence.
Verification
Given: The block laws in the Example.
Each is a probability law on . The finite product is nonnegative and sums to , so it is a well-defined finite law. Summing over the last coordinate gives , proving consistency.
Let be the number of fair coordinates among . At every positive-probability word, each fair coordinate contributes to and every point-mass coordinate contributes . Hence on the entire support, so its law under is a point mass at this value.
If is even, the newest block is fair and ; since , . If is odd, the newest block is deterministic and , so .
By step 2.1, is deterministic under . Step 3.1 gives subsequential limits and . For any constant , at least one of and is at least ; along that subsequence, for , the probability of is eventually . Thus there is no limit in probability to a constant. The coordinate laws alternate, so the IID hypotheses of [F2] are absent.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, 2nd ed., Chapter 3, §3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- MIT OpenCourseWare 6.441 Information Theory, Spring 2010, Lecture 3: Convergence and Asymptotic Equipartition Property (standard reference, not scraped)