How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An index-two DAE can have zero algebraic residual and an arbitrary algebraic variable
Example
Consider the scalar semi-explicit system
Its algebraic Jacobian is , so it is not regular index one. In the convention of Differentiation index for a regular local semi-explicit DAE, differentiating once gives , and differentiating again gives ; the system has differentiation index two. The algebraic residual is : at every candidate , it is zero for any , although the algebraic variable of a solution must be . Thus no residual-to--error bound holds near . The initial pair satisfies the algebraic equation but is not consistent with a solution, while violates the algebraic equation and cannot be an initial value.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed DAE on .
Semi-explicit index-one DAEs and consistent initial data: a semi-explicit DAE has differential equation and algebraic equation ; algebraic consistency means .
Differentiation index for a regular local semi-explicit DAE: differentiate the algebraic constraint along the differential equation; the index is the least positive differentiation count at which the regular prolonged equation determines the algebraic variables and their first derivatives.
For the index calculation, and on a nondegenerate interval, and the constraint holds at every time in that interval.
Verification
Here and , so at every point. The regular index-one hypothesis invertible therefore fails.
Along any solution, differentiating and substituting gives . Differentiating this relation gives . The original constraint does not involve ; the first differentiated relation determines , and the second determines its first derivative. By [F2] the differentiation index is two.
For every real , the candidate has algebraic residual , while step 2.1 shows that a solution has . Taking arbitrarily small rules out any finite constant for which throughout a neighborhood of .
The pair satisfies , but a solution would require by step 2.1, so it is not a consistent initial pair for a solution. The pair has , so it fails even algebraic consistency.
The constant functions satisfy both equations, so the system has a solution with the consistent initial pair . The three boundary calculations above concern only this fixed index-two system and imply no index-one numerical guarantee.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kendall Atkinson, Weimin Han, and David Stewart, Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations, Chapter 10 §§10.0–10.3 (standard reference, not scraped)