How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Indicator of the rationals has zero essential supremum but pointwise supremum one
Example
On with Lebesgue measure, let . Then
So essential supremum and pointwise supremum need not agree.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The function on .
The essential supremum is the infimum of the essential bounds (The essential supremum of a measurable function with respect to a measure).
is countable, and every at most countable subset of is null ( is countably infinite, Every at most countable subset of has measure zero).
Verification
The pointwise supremum is because on every rational point of .
If , then , which is null by [L2]; if , then , which is also null. Hence every is an essential bound in the sense of [L1], and therefore .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the two claims.
Depends on
Used by
- FALSE: the essential supremum equals the pointwise supremum False statement
Dependency tree · two levels
34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory, Definition 7.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Section 2.5 (standard reference, not scraped)