How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The two induced co- witnesses behind the forbidden path runs
Example
In the ambient configuration of the preceding lemma, an induced with adjacent only to gives the six-vertex witness on . An induced with adjacent to only gives the six-vertex witness on . The other vertex of the ambient complete nonedge pair does not belong to this second witness.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two configurations in the Example.
Co- is the complement of the stated graph (The -graph and co-).
Proof
In the first configuration the nonedges are exactly , the -edges in the order . In the second they are exactly , the -edges in the order . Hence both graphs are co-.
Their displayed paths are induced and the mixed vertex has respectively two consecutive nonneighbours and three consecutive neighbours.
This verifies both finite witnesses.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Huang, Ju, and Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, Figure 8 (standard reference, not scraped)