Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)verified 2026-07-26 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

inf{1/n:n1}=0\inf\{1/n : n \ge 1\} = 0, not attained, while sup{1/n:n1}=1\sup\{1/n : n \ge 1\} = 1 is

Example

Write n1n \cdot 1 for the canonical natural number 1++1n\underbrace{1 + \cdots + 1}_{n} of R\mathbb{R} (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing) and 1/n:=(n1)11/n := (n \cdot 1)^{-1}. The set H={1/n : n1}={1, 1/2, 1/3, }H = \{\, 1/n \ : \ n \ge 1 \,\} = \{\, 1,\ 1/2,\ 1/3,\ \dots \,\} has infH=0\inf H = 0, which is not attained, and supH=1\sup H = 1, which is attained, being maxH\max H (Maximum and minimum of a set).

The interesting half is the infimum, and it is exactly the Archimedean property (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean) in disguise. That 00 is a lower bound is immediate from positivity of the canonical naturals. That no positive number is a lower bound is the statement that the reciprocals of the naturals get below every positive ε\varepsilon, which is what the Archimedean property asserts once applied to ε1\varepsilon^{-1}. Leastness is then read off from the epsilon characterisation Epsilon characterisation of the infimum. Nothing is asserted by inspection: for each ε>0\varepsilon > 0 an explicit index is produced.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The complete ordered field R\mathbb{R}; for a natural number n1n \ge 1 let n1n \cdot 1 denote the canonical natural of R\mathbb{R} and write 1/n:=(n1)11/n := (n \cdot 1)^{-1}; and let H:={1/n:n1}H := \{\, 1/n : n \ge 1 \,\}.

[L1]

Canonical naturals: 11=11 \cdot 1 = 1; n1>0n \cdot 1 > 0 for every n1n \ge 1; and nn1n \mapsto n \cdot 1 is strictly increasing on {1,2,3,}\{1, 2, 3, \dots\}, so that 1=11n11 = 1 \cdot 1 \le n \cdot 1 for every n1n \ge 1, with equality exactly when n=1n = 1 (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).

[L2]

Archimedean property: R\mathbb{R} is a complete ordered field, hence Archimedean, so for every xRx \in \mathbb{R} there is a natural n1n \ge 1 with x<n1x < n \cdot 1 (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean, Archimedean ordered field).

[L3]

Inverses and order: if a>0a > 0 then a1>0a^{-1} > 0; if 0<a<b0 < a < b then 0<b1<a10 < b^{-1} < a^{-1} (claims 1 and 2 of Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order); and, from uniqueness of the multiplicative inverse, (a1)1=a(a^{-1})^{-1} = a for every a0a \ne 0 and 11=11^{-1} = 1, since a1a=1a^{-1} a = 1 exhibits aa as an inverse of a1a^{-1} and the identity axiom 1x=x1 \cdot x = x at x=1x = 1 exhibits 11 as an inverse of itself (Field).

[L4]

Multiplying by a positive constant is an order equivalence: for c>0c > 0 one has x<yx < y if and only if xc<ycxc < yc, and hence, by trichotomy, xyx \le y if and only if xcycxc \le yc (Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, Ordered field).

[L5]

Epsilon characterisation of the infimum: for a nonempty XRX \subseteq \mathbb{R} bounded below and a lower bound mm of XX, one has m=infXm = \inf X if and only if for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is xXx \in X with x<m+εx < m + \varepsilon (Epsilon characterisation of the infimum, Greatest lower bound (infimum)).

[L6]

Maximum and attainment: m=maxXm = \max X means mXm \in X and xmx \le m for all xXx \in X; if a nonempty XX has a maximum then supX\sup X exists and supX=maxX\sup X = \max X (Maximum and minimum of a set, The supremum is attained exactly when a maximum exists).

[L7]

Order: trichotomy holds, so a<aa < a is impossible and the negation of aba \le b is b<ab < a; the order is transitive; and 0<10 < 1 (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Ordered field, The multiplicative identity is positive).

[L8]

Lower bound and bounded below: \ell bounds XX below when x\ell \le x for all xXx \in X, and XX is bounded below when such an \ell exists (Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set).

[L9]

Minimum, and the infimum as greatest lower bound: m=minXm = \min X means mXm \in X and mxm \le x for all xXx \in X, so a minimum is a lower bound of XX belonging to XX (Maximum and minimum of a set); and infX\inf X is the greatest lower bound, so infX\ell \le \inf X for every lower bound \ell of XX (Greatest lower bound (infimum)).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

HH is nonempty: taking n=1n = 1 gives the canonical natural 11=11 \cdot 1 = 1 by [L1], and 1/1=11=11/1 = 1^{-1} = 1 by [L3], so 1H1 \in H.

L1L3
1.2

Every element of HH is positive, so 00 is a lower bound of HH and HH is bounded below: for n1n \ge 1 one has n1>0n \cdot 1 > 0, hence 1/n=(n1)1>01/n = (n \cdot 1)^{-1} > 0 and in particular 01/n0 \le 1/n.

L1L3L8
1.3

Every element of HH is 1\le 1: fix n1n \ge 1 and multiply by the positive constant n1n \cdot 1, which by [L4] turns the inequality (n1)11(n \cdot 1)^{-1} \le 1 into the equivalent inequality 1=(n1)1(n1)1(n1)=n11 = (n \cdot 1)^{-1}(n \cdot 1) \le 1 \cdot (n \cdot 1) = n \cdot 1, and the latter holds by [L1].

L1L3L4
1.4

Let ε>0\varepsilon > 0 be arbitrary; then ε1>0\varepsilon^{-1} > 0, and the Archimedean property applied to ε1\varepsilon^{-1} supplies a natural nε1n_\varepsilon \ge 1 with ε1<nε1\varepsilon^{-1} < n_\varepsilon \cdot 1.

assume-hypL2L3choose
2.1

That index witnesses the approximation: from 0<ε1<nε10 < \varepsilon^{-1} < n_\varepsilon \cdot 1 and [L3] one gets 0<(nε1)1<(ε1)1=ε0 < (n_\varepsilon \cdot 1)^{-1} < (\varepsilon^{-1})^{-1} = \varepsilon, that is 1/nεH1/n_\varepsilon \in H with 1/nε<0+ε1/n_\varepsilon < 0 + \varepsilon.

step 1.4L3L7
2.2

0H0 \notin H: every element of HH is >0> 0 by 1.2, whereas 0>00 > 0 is impossible by irreflexivity.

step 1.2L7
2.3

1=maxH1 = \max H: the element 11 lies in HH by 1.1 and dominates every element of HH by 1.3.

step 1.1step 1.3L6
3.1

HH is nonempty and bounded below by 00, and for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 some element of HH is <0+ε< 0 + \varepsilon; the epsilon characterisation therefore gives infH=0\inf H = 0.

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1L5
3.2

Since HH is nonempty with maximum 11, the attainment criterion gives that supH\sup H exists and supH=maxH=1H\sup H = \max H = 1 \in H.

step 2.3step 1.1L6
4.1

HH has no minimum: a minimum of HH would be a lower bound of HH lying in HH, hence at most the greatest lower bound infH=0\inf H = 0; but every element of HH is >0> 0 by 1.2, and x0x \le 0 together with 0<x0 < x is impossible by trichotomy.

step 3.1step 1.2L7L9
5.1

Hence infH=0H\inf H = 0 \notin H and supH=1H\sup H = 1 \in H: the infimum of HH is not attained and HH has no minimum, while the supremum is attained and is the maximum.

step 3.1step 3.2step 2.2step 4.1L6

Remarks

  • The set HH is bounded, with 0h10 \le h \le 1 for every hHh \in H, and its members are pairwise distinct, since n1/nn \mapsto 1/n is strictly decreasing on {1,2,3,}\{1, 2, 3, \dots\}: for n<mn < m the map nn1n \mapsto n \cdot 1 is strictly increasing by [L1], so 0<n1<m10 < n \cdot 1 < m \cdot 1, and inversion reverses that by [L3], giving 1/m<1/n1/m < 1/n. It is the standard example showing that a bounded set with infinitely many members can attain one of its two bounds and miss the other. ("Infinite" is used here in its everyday sense: no definition of finiteness is in scope on this page, and nothing above or below depends on one.)
  • Positivity of every element is what makes 00 a lower bound, and the Archimedean property is what makes it the greatest one. In a non-Archimedean ordered field the argument breaks at exactly one point, step 1.4: it is the Archimedean property (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean) that supplies, for a given ε>0\varepsilon > 0, an index nεn_\varepsilon with ε1<nε1\varepsilon^{-1} < n_\varepsilon \cdot 1, and hence with 1/nε<ε1/n_\varepsilon < \varepsilon in step 2.1. And Not every ordered field is Archimedean exhibits an ordered field where no such natural exists. What that item establishes is the failure of the Archimedean property there; it says nothing about HH or its greatest lower bound, and this page does not compute one. So the value infH=0\inf H = 0 is a statement about R\mathbb{R}, not a formal manipulation.
  • Read as a sequence rather than a set, HH is the classical null sequence; the rational form of the same fact is The sequence 1/n1/n is null.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 23 results over 8 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources