How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A line constraint removes one kernel direction
Example
Use with its Euclidean metric, with its absolute-value metric, and . Let be , and restrict the truth class to . Every scalar datum has exactly one admissible preimage, and ; this constraint removes the vertical null direction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and with the stated Euclidean and absolute-value metrics, , and the nonempty constraint class .
Admissible constraint classes and restricted identifiability: restricted identifiability means injectivity of , and .
A constraint removes kernel ambiguity exactly when its differences avoid the kernel: is injective if and only if .
Verification
From , . Also , whose intersection with this vertical kernel is .
By [F2] and step 1.1, is injective. For any , and , so it is the unique admissible preimage of .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.