How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Integrated score error can miss every Euler evaluation
Example
In the finite-dimensional Gaussian credible-ball question reproduced below, choose , , , , , and , with arbitrary positive . Take the numerical operator equal to the true operator, so . For every integer there is a jointly Borel finite score field with integrated score error exactly zero, whose Euler terminal law is for every observation. With independent terminal draws, the resulting empirical ball has frequentist coverage tending to zero at truth , although the stated uniform boundary-margin condition holds with exponent . The exact credible-ball baseline satisfies . Consequently no bound in that question can have uniformly over its original score class as . The original formulation is retained verbatim under Original question.
Example references
Original question
Fix integers , parameters , a credibility error , and a continuous schedule with . Let Observe , , with independent . Use the proper Gaussian prior , and let be its exact posterior under the stated forward operator and noise law. Let be the posterior mean and let be the unique radius for which the Euclidean ball has posterior probability . Define the exact frequentist coverage and its baseline error .
For a deterministic numerical matrix with and , let be the Gaussian posterior formed with and the same prior and noise variance. Write for the density obtained by applying the forward variance-preserving diffusion to , and set . A jointly Borel learned score field is required to satisfy For , define the reverse-time Euler chain by and, for , where the are independent vectors independent of and the observations. Draw independent copies of this chain conditionally on and denote their terminal values by . Let , let be the empirical quantile of (the smallest order statistic whose empirical cumulative mass is at least ), and put . Suppose the exact credible-ball boundary satisfies the uniform margin condition for fixed and . Determine whether a minimax-sharp nonasymptotic function exists uniformly over all such score fields and, if it does, find it as a function of , and such that with matching lower bounds that identify when . The probability includes observation noise and sampler randomness. The target concerns the additional coverage error introduced by the approximate forward operator, learned score, finite reverse discretization, and finite posterior sample; it does not assume that the exact Bayesian credible ball is already calibrated on every truth class.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The scalar parameter choices in the Example and the original score-error, Euler and empirical-ball definitions reproduced below it.
Write and . A standard Gaussian has density , mean zero, variance one and tail probability tending to zero at infinity.
Let and let solve for a standard Gaussian . Continuity and strict positivity of give existence and uniqueness of .
Verification
Given: The scalar model and [A1]–[A2].
Completing the square in gives posterior , so its exact credible interval is . Under truth , and the exact coverage is . This is a continuous strictly positive function of , and is at most one. By compactness of it has a positive minimum . Therefore .
Put and let . Away from this finite set of times, use the exact noised-posterior score. At each set . This finite-valued jointly Borel field has zero integrated score error: its discrepancy from the exact score is supported on the finite, Lebesgue-null set in time. The noised posterior has mean and variance : the integrating-factor solution of the linear forward equation is , whose independent Gaussian integral has variance (use dyadic Brownian-increment sums and pass their Gaussian characteristic functions to the mean-square limit). Its exact score is therefore affine in , so the inner Gaussian error integral is finite at every time. The zero-error conclusion holds for every observation and hence uniformly over all truths.
The variable has a density bounded by uniformly in . The event is contained in two intervals of total length at most . Thus its probability is at most . The required margin holds, for example with , and .
At every Euler step the deterministic update becomes . Thus each new state is , independently of its input and of , and the terminal law is . For , write the independent terminal draws as . If , then the empirical center differs from one by at most and every empirical distance to that center is at most . Hence the empirical radius has that same upper bound.
The Gaussian density gives for : integrate on and use . The union bound then gives . On the complementary event the center is at least and the radius at most , so for all sufficiently large the empirical interval excludes truth zero. Its coverage therefore tends to zero, and its deviation from tends to . Since both error norms are zero and , a uniformly vanishing would contradict this strict gap.
Scope of the resolution
This resolves the requested uniformly vanishing-error guarantee negatively under the original score hypothesis. Time-integrated error does not control pointwise values at a deterministic solver grid. A constant worst-case coverage bound remains possible; no impossibility of all numerical functions is asserted. No Bayesian calibration claim is imported from a conformal theorem.
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- B. T. Knapik, A. W. van der Vaart, and J. H. van Zanten, Bayesian inverse problems with Gaussian priors, Annals of Statistics 39 (2011) (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Szabó, A. W. van der Vaart, and J. H. van Zanten, Frequentist coverage of adaptive nonparametric Bayesian credible sets, Annals of Statistics 43 (2015) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Evarist Giné and Richard Nickl, Mathematical Foundations of Infinite-Dimensional Statistical Models, Cambridge University Press (2016) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Dominik Narnhofer, Andreas Habring, Martin Holler, and Thomas Pock, Posterior-Variance-Based Error Quantification for Inverse Problems in Imaging, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences 17 (2024) (standard reference, not scraped)