How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Small absolute operator error does not give a uniform inverse bound without conditioning
Example
Fix a truth bound . For every absolute operator-shift radius , take the working scalar operator , the true operator , the noiseless datum at truth , and the working inverse . Then but . Thus no recovery modulus tending to zero with the absolute operator error can hold uniformly when the baseline inverse conditioning is allowed to vanish.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , any , working operator , true operator , truth , noiseless data , and working inverse .
In the scalar model the operator norm is absolute value, and the recovery loss is squared absolute error.
Verification
The absolute operator discrepancy is .
By step 1.1 this is an allowed perturbation. The true noiseless datum is , so . The squared reconstruction error is , independent of . Since is fixed while can be arbitrarily small, a uniform modulus depending only on absolute operator shift cannot tend to zero.
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.