How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact scalar MMSE denoiser for a two-point prior
Example
Let and let the scalar prior put mass at each of and . Under the Gaussian likelihood kernel , its exact posterior-mean map is The normalizing constant of the Gaussian likelihood cancels in the posterior. For every , uniquely minimizes the posterior squared-error risk and, with the potential constructed from this prior, is the unique global minimizer of .
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the two-point prior and Gaussian likelihood in the Example, and the definitions of a Dirac probability measure and the exact posterior-mean map.
The Dirac set function at a point: when and otherwise.
A Dirac set function is a probability measure: each Dirac set function is a probability measure.
The exponential addition formula : for all real .
Tweedie identity, positive Jacobian, and the MMSE proximal potential: if a Borel probability measure on is not concentrated on an affine hyperplane, then for the Gaussian likelihood kernel its posterior-mean map uniquely minimizes posterior squared-error risk and the constructed makes that map the unique global minimizer of .
Verification
Given: The hypotheses and definitions in the Example.
By [F1]–[F2], is a probability measure: for pairwise-disjoint Borel sets each of the two atoms occurs in at most one set, and . Since , its two atoms are distinct and each has positive mass; every affine hyperplane in is a singleton, so is not concentrated on any affine hyperplane. The posterior weights at and are proportional to and , hence .
Factoring from numerator and denominator and using [F3] yields , which is the stated hyperbolic-tangent formula.
Fact [F4] applies to this nondegenerate two-point prior, so the posterior mean is the unique squared-error minimizer and the lemma's makes the unique global minimizer of the displayed proximal objective for every .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Xiaojian Xu, Yu Sun, Jiaming Liu, Brendt Wohlberg, and Ulugbek S. Kamilov, Provable Convergence of Plug-and-Play Priors with MMSE Denoisers, IEEE Signal Processing Letters 27 (2020), arXiv:2005.07685 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Rémi Gribonval and Mila Nikolova, On Bayesian Estimation and Proximity Operators, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis 50 (2021), 49–72, arXiv:1807.04021 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Neal Parikh and Stephen Boyd, Proximal Algorithms, Foundations and Trends in Optimization 1(3) (2014) (standard reference, not scraped)