How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A proper Gaussian prior gives nonuniform finite-sample coverage on an unbounded truth class
Example
Fix , , and . Observe independent under truth and use prior . Let , , and , where is the standard normal cumulative distribution function. The exact posterior credible interval is . Since , its repeated-sampling coverage at fixed tends to zero as , despite exact posterior computation and exact sampling.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The scalar normal observation model and proper prior in the Example, with , , and .
Completing the Gaussian likelihood and prior gives posterior mean , variance , and central credible radius .
The standard normal cumulative distribution has vanishing tails: as and as .
Verification
At every fixed , lies strictly between zero and one, and is finite and independent of the observation. Under truth , has mean and fixed positive standard deviation .
Standardizing the event in the Example gives .
As , both arguments in step 1.2 tend to , so both cumulative probabilities tend to one by [A2] and their difference tends to zero. As , both arguments tend to and their difference again tends to zero. Thus the infimum coverage over is zero at each fixed .
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.