How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Small L² log-density perturbations can remain far in Hellinger distance
Statement
For integers , on let , , , and . Then but . Thus the norm of a log-density perturbation need not control the induced Hellinger distance.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated finite-measure space and functions.
Verification
Since , . The normalizer is , so is a positive unit-mass density.
The Hellinger affinity is Since , this is at most . The exponential series gives , hence .
By [F1], , and nonnegativity of Hellinger distance gives .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. W. van der Vaart and J. H. van Zanten, Rates of contraction of posterior distributions based on Gaussian process priors, §3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Bas J. K. Kleijn, Aad W. van der Vaart and Harry van Zanten, Lectures on Nonparametric Bayesian Statistics, §12.2 (standard reference, not scraped)