How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A concrete calculation of
Example
Let , , and over the alphabet . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and .
Language concatenation is by Language concatenation, powers, and Kleene star.
Language concatenation is associative by Language concatenation is associative.
Verification
Using [L1], we have . Therefore
Again by [L1], . Therefore
The two explicit calculations in steps 1.1 and 1.2 agree, so this example realizes the identity of [L2] as the four-word set .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean Gallier and Jocelyn Quaintance, Introduction to the Theory of Computation: Some Notes for CIS511 (standard reference, not scraped)