Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Levi form of the unit ball

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC). Let m≥1 and put ρ(z):=∣z∣2−1 on Cm, where ∣z∣2=∑j<m∣zj∣2. Then Lρ(a;ξ)=∣ξ∣2=∑j<m∣ξj∣2 for every a∈Cm and every ξ∈Cm. In particular, at every point p of the unit sphere {∣z∣=1} and for every nonzero complex tangent vector ξ at p one has Lρ(p;ξ)=∣ξ∣2>0. Consequently the unit ball B={z∈Cm:ρ(z)<0} is strongly pseudoconvex, that is: B is a domain, and at every boundary point p of B the function ρ is a C∞ defining function with dρ(p)≠0 and with Lρ(p;ξ)>0 for every nonzero complex tangent vector ξ at p. In the terminology of Levi pseudoconvex domains, B is Levi pseudoconvex with strict positivity on complex tangents.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; an integer m≥1; the function ρ(z):=∣z∣2−1=∑j<m∣zj∣2−1 on Cm; and the unit ball B:={z∈Cm:ρ(z)<0}.

[F1]

For u∈C2 on an open set, the Levi form is Lu(a;v):=∑j<m∑k<m∂2u∂zj∂zˉk(a) vjvk‾, and u is strictly plurisubharmonic when Lu(a;v)>0 for every a and every v≠0 (The Levi form and strict plurisubharmonicity, with its coordinate labels relabeled from 1,…,m to the canonical 0,…,m−1).

[F2]

A domain Ω⊆Cm with C2 boundary is Levi pseudoconvex when for every p∈∂Ω there are a neighbourhood U and ρ∈C2(U,R) with Ω∩U={ρ<0}, dρ(p)≠0, and Lρ(p;v)≥0 for every complex tangent vector v satisfying ∑j∂ρ∂zj(p)vj=0 (Levi pseudoconvex domains).

[F3]

The Wirtinger operators are ∂zkf:=12(∂xkf−i ∂ykf),∂zˉkf:=12(∂xkf+i ∂ykf)(k<m), and for real totally differentiable f the differential is recovered by Df(a)h=∑k<m(∂zkf(a)hk+∂zˉkf(a)hk‾) (Wirtinger operators in Cm).

[F4]

In a metric space every ball βn=B(x,1/n) with n≥1 is an open subset containing x (The balls B(x,1/n), n≥1, form a countable neighbourhood base at x, so every metric space is first countable).

[F5]

The open ball of centre a and radius ρ>0 in Cm is B(a,ρ)={z:∥z−a∥<ρ} for the norm ∥⋅∥ of [F6] (Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in Cm).

[F6]

∥z∥:=(∑k<m∣zk∣2)1/2 is a norm on the real vector space underlying Cm, ∥z−w∥ is the metric of Cm, and the metric, the balls, the open sets, the convergent sequences and the continuous maps of Cm are verbatim those of R2m under Φ (Complex m-space and its real coordinate dictionary).

[F7]

A norm N satisfies N(λv)=∣λ∣N(v) and N(u+v)≤N(u)+N(v), and N(v)=0 only for v=0 (A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms, claims (N1)–(N3)).

[F8]

Every ball of Rn in each of the norms ∥⋅∥1,∥⋅∥2,∥⋅∥∞ is convex, path-connected and connected (Every convex subset of Rn, in particular every ball and Rn itself, is path-connected and hence connected).

[F9]

The boundary of a set A in a metric space is ∂A=A‾∖int⁡(A) (Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space).

[F10]

AC states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

Choice use. AC is the ambient hypothesis recorded in the Example, and [F10] is cited as that hypothesis. The proof selects nothing: the coordinate computations, the point 0∈B, the explicit radius r=(∥p∥−1)/2 and the radial points (1−t)p studied in the boundary step below are all formulas, so no family of nonempty sets is ever presented for selection.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F3F10givenalgebra

Writing zj=xj+iyj, the coordinate expression ρ=∑j<m(xj2+yj2)−1 is a polynomial, so ρ∈C∞(Cm,R); applying [F3] to the partials ∂xjρ=2xj and ∂yjρ=2yj gives ∂zjρ(a)=12(2xj−2iyj)=aj‾ and ∂zˉjρ(a)=12(2xj+2iyj)=aj at every a∈Cm.

1.2F4F5F6F7F8

The set B={z:ρ(z)<0}={z:∥z∥<1}=B(0,1) is the open ball of radius 1 about 0 in the sense of [F5], hence is an open subset of Cm by [F4] with n=1; it is nonempty because ∥0∥=0<1 by [F7]; and it is connected, because Φ(B) is the unit ball of R2m for the Euclidean norm, which is path-connected and connected by [F8], while [F6] carries the open sets of Cm onto those of R2m. Thus B is a domain.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Differentiating the first-order expressions of step 1.1 gives ∂2ρ/∂zj∂zˉk=δjk for all j,k<m, so [F1] yields, for every a∈Cm and every ξ∈Cm, Lρ(a;ξ)=∑j,k<mδjkξjξk‾=∑j<m∣ξj∣2=∣ξ∣2.

2.2F7F9step 1.2

The boundary of B is exactly the unit sphere {∥z∥=1}: if ∥p∥<1 then p∈B and B is open by step 1.2, so p∉∂B by [F9]; if ∥p∥>1 then with r:=(∥p∥−1)/2>0 every z with ∥z−p∥<r satisfies ∥z∥≥∥p∥−∥p−z∥>(∥p∥+1)/2>1 by [F7], so the ball about p of radius r misses B and p∉B‾, hence p∉∂B by [F9]; and if ∥p∥=1 then for 0<t<1 the points (1−t)p lie in B, since ∥(1−t)p∥=1−t<1 by [F7], and converge to p, since ∥(1−t)p−p∥=t, while p∉B; hence p∈B‾∖B=B‾∖int⁡(B)=∂B by [F9].

3.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1

At a point p with ∥p∥=1 one has ρ(p)=0; the complex tangent vectors at p are those ξ with ∑j∂ρ∂zj(p)ξj=∑jpj‾ξj=0 by [F2] and step 1.1, and each nonzero such ξ satisfies Lρ(p;ξ)=∣ξ∣2>0 by step 2.1; also dρ(p)≠0, because if Dρ(p)=0 then [F3] forces every Wirtinger partial ∂zjρ(p)=pj‾ and ∂zˉjρ(p)=pj to vanish, whereas some pj≠0 since ∥p∥=1.

4.1F1F2step 2.1step 2.2∎

Conclusion: every boundary point of B satisfies ∥p∥=1 by step 2.2, so with U:=Cm the pair (U,ρ) satisfies B∩U={ρ<0}, dρ(p)≠0 and Lρ(p;ξ)=∣ξ∣2>0 for every nonzero complex tangent vector ξ by step 3.1; this is the strict form of the condition in [F2], so the unit ball is strongly pseudoconvex, and in particular, weakening > to ≥, it is Levi pseudoconvex in the sense of [F2]; moreover ρ is strictly plurisubharmonic on all of Cm by [F1] and step 2.1, since Lρ(a;ξ)=∣ξ∣2>0 for every a and every ξ≠0.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

68 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources