How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Lévy collapse of a regular uncountable cardinal
Statement
For regular uncountable , makes every countable while preserving , so is exactly the new ; the example displays the dense sets making each coordinate map onto .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses, objects, and conventions in the Statement.
Cardinal effects of collapse and Lévy-collapse forcing proves the general effect and preservation statement.
Proof
Fix . For let , and for let . Extend a finite condition at the requested coordinate, choosing a fresh for , so both families are dense. A generic meets them all, and is a surjection .
F1 gives -cc, hence preserves the cardinal . Since every infinite ordinal below it is countable by step 1.1, is the least uncountable cardinal in the extension, namely .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Karagila, Forcing & Symmetric Extensions, Lévy collapse (standard reference, not scraped)