How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Lucky breakdown occurs when the current Krylov space is already invariant
Example
Let
Then and , because . Arnoldi therefore breaks down exactly after the first step: the next residual is zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The diagonal matrix and start vector .
Exact Arnoldi breakdown at the next step is equivalent to invariance of the current Krylov space (Exact Arnoldi breakdown is equivalent to invariance of the current Krylov space).
Verification
Here and , so the current Krylov space is -invariant.
By [L1], that invariance is equivalent to exact Arnoldi breakdown at the next step. Concretely, the Arnoldi residual is .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lloyd N. Trefethen and David Bau III, Numerical Linear Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)