How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A concrete geometric majorant
Example
For at the origin, and give .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The explicit two-variable germ and proposed geometric majorant in the Example; their coefficient comparison is to be calculated.
Compare ordinary coefficients at each multi-index. (Coefficientwise majorisation).
Verification
For , the geometric expansion and binomial formula give . Hence . The proposed majorant has coefficient .
Outside the comparison follows from . At the coefficients are 2 and 8, respectively. In particular the constant coefficients are 1 and 2. Every coefficient is nonnegative, so these inequalities give the claimed majorisation by F1.
Source notes
Gantumur, §3 Exercise 14, printed p. 8, supplies the geometric-majorant construction; this concrete polynomial perturbation and calculation are adapted locally.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gantumur, Math 580 Lecture Notes 2: The Cauchy-Kovalevskaya Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)