How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A concrete majority-vote error estimate from Chebyshev's inequality
Example
If independent trials are each correct with probability , then the majority vote is wrong with probability at most .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: independent Bernoulli trials, each correct with probability .
The Chebyshev majority bound gives whenever each trial has success probability at least (Chebyshev bounds the majority error of repeated Bernoulli trials).
Verification
The hypotheses of [L1] hold with because .
Therefore the majority error probability is at most . This is a concrete instance of the general estimate.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Eric Blais, Models of Computation, 14. Randomized Computation (standard reference, not scraped)