How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A three-level telescoping estimator and its remaining bias
Example
Take , , , target , and deterministic level values . Every correction sample is constant, so sample counts do not change the estimate. The three levels make the telescoping identity and the remaining finest-level bias explicit.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The deterministic target and level values above, with any positive integer sample counts .
Geometric MLMC hierarchy and coupled corrections: and for , with an estimator equal to the sum of level sample means.
Expectation, variance, and MSE of a finite MLMC estimator: the estimator mean is and its MSE is its sampling variance plus the squared difference between and the target mean.
Verification
Since each level is deterministic, [F1] gives , , and .
Each sample mean equals its constant correction, so . Its sampling variance is zero, while [F2] gives MSE .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michael B. Giles, Multilevel Monte Carlo Path Simulation, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)