How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A multiple residue root need not lift uniquely
Example
Over the -adic integers , the polynomial has the multiple residue root , but that root does not lift uniquely.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The polynomial over .
Simple roots lift uniquely in Henselian local rings; the derivative hypothesis is therefore the load-bearing condition (Factor lifting implies simple-root lifting).
Verification
Modulo , the polynomial becomes so the residue root has multiplicity . Equivalently, .
In , both and satisfy , and both reduce to modulo . Hence the residue root has at least two lifts.
Therefore the derivative-unit hypothesis in [L1] cannot be dropped: a multiple residue root need not lift uniquely even in a complete local ring.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 10.153: Henselian local rings (standard reference, not scraped)